﴿ٱدْعُ إِلَىٰ سَبِيلِ رَبِّكَ بِٱلْحِكْمَةِ وَٱلْمَوْعِظَةِ ٱلْحَسَنَةِ ۖ وَجَٰدِلْهُم بِٱلَّتِى هِىَ أَحْسَنُ﴾
Call unto the way of thy Lord with wisdom and fair exhortation, and reason with them in the better way. — Surah an-Nahl 16:125, tr. Marmaduke Pickthall (1930)
The hereafter and justice — Questions people ask about Islam
Eternal punishment for finite unbelief, evil and suffering, God’s foreknowledge and human choice, those the message never reached, and the children of non-Muslims.
154 questions · 1,732 passages quoted and attributed · and 86 questions carrying a graded, verified hadith.
-
Why is a finite life of unbelief punished with an infinite, unending torment? How does that square with mercy?
It runs the other way from what is usually assumed. The rule of proportion your objection rests on is not what the text rejects; it is what the text states: "Whoso doeth an ill-deed, he will be repaid the like thereof" 1. The commentary reads it as a repayment in the hereafter of nothing but a punishment equal to the sin itself 2. And the scale is tilted toward mercy by the wording, not by rhetoric: a good deed counts tenfold, a bad deed is never counted more than once — "Whoso bringeth a good deed will receive tenfold the like thereof, while whoso bringeth an ill-deed will be awarded but the like thereof; and they will not be wronged" 3. The passage that names the recompense of the unbelievers holds both points together in six verses: they remain there for long ages, and the sentence on them is "Reward proportioned (to their evil deeds)" 4 — they abide, in the commentary's words, for successive ages that do not come to an end, and "are repaid with a just recompense matching the deeds they used to do" 5. Al-Kirmani read the wording the same way: the recompense of the unbeliever is in accordance with his deeds, and the recompense that goes beyond accordance is the believer's alone 6. So the dispute is not about proportion. It is about the measure of the offence. The text does not measure it by seventy years, but by a will that stops at no limit: "And if they were sent back they would return unto that which they are forbidden" 7 — were they supposed to be returned to this world and given more time, the commentary says, they would go back to the same obstinacy, to unbelief and denial 8. On this Ibn al-Qayyim built his statement that whoever supposes God "treats opposites as equals" has thought ill of Him, and he placed the ground of unending punishment in the man "who does not believe in Him for the blink of an eye, and who has spent the hours of his life in what angers Him and in enmity to His messengers and His religion" — not in the mere running out of a limited lifespan 9. None of this should be taken as a settled answer. The duration itself was an openly stated difficulty in the tradition: al-Nahhas wrote that the verse contains "a difficulty", and reported that al-Mubarrad, asked about the ages the verse names, answered with a question — "what does this limit mean?" — and then "did not answer us about it for some thirty-odd years" 10. And the site's book When did you begin to doubt? states the objection in the objector's own terms, strikes out the frame of the medicine and the doctor rather than patching it, and says: "I am in no position to tell you 'the punishment is not everlasting', nor 'it is everlasting for certain' … And whoever has given you a one-line answer in this matter has given you his own opinion in the dress of religion." 11
1 Whoso doeth an ill-deed, he will be repaid the like thereof, while whoso doeth right, whether male or female, and is a believer, (all) such will enter the Garden, where they will be nourished without stint.
Surah Ghafir (The Forgiver) 40:40 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
2 Whoever disobeyed God in his life and turned aside from the path of guidance is repaid in the hereafter with nothing but a punishment equal to his disobedience. And whoever obeyed God and did righteous work, carrying out His commands and avoiding what He forbade, male or female, believing in God and holding Him one — those enter the Garden, where God provides them from its fruits, its bliss and its delights without reckoning.
al-Tafsir al-Muyassar (The Simplified Commentary) · Ghafir 40:40 our rendering · Open the passage
3 Whoso bringeth a good deed will receive tenfold the like thereof, while whoso bringeth an ill-deed will be awarded but the like thereof; and they will not be wronged.
Surah Al-An'am (The Cattle) 6:160 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
4 Reward proportioned (to their evil deeds).
Surah An-Naba' (The Tidings) 78:23-26 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
5 On that Day Hell lies in wait for the people of unbelief, for whom it was prepared, a place of return for the unbelievers, where they remain for successive ages that do not come to an end … by that they are repaid with a just recompense matching the deeds they used to do in this world.
al-Tafsir al-Muyassar (The Simplified Commentary) · An-Naba' 78:26 our rendering · Open the passage
6 His words, a recompense in accordance, and after them, a recompense from thy Lord, a gift, a reckoning: the first is for the unbelievers, and God Most High has said that the recompense of an evil deed is an evil deed the like of it, so their recompense is in accordance with their deeds; and the second is for the believers, and their recompense is a full and sufficient one, and for this He said hisaban — that is, sufficient, from your saying 'it is enough for me'; and this is my view.
al-Kirmani · Asrar al-Takrar fi al-Qur'an (The Secrets of Repetition in the Qur'an), p. 244 our rendering · Open the passage
7 Nay, but that hath become clear unto them which before they used to hide. And if they were sent back they would return unto that which they are forbidden. Lo! they are liars.
Surah Al-An'am (The Cattle) 6:28 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
8 It is not so. Rather, on the Day of Resurrection there appeared to them what they had known within themselves of the truth of what the messengers brought in this world, even while they used to show his followers the opposite of it. And were it supposed that they were returned to this world and given more time, they would go back to the same obstinacy, to unbelief and denial. And they are liars in their saying: were we sent back to the world we would not deny the signs of our Lord, and we would be among the believers.
al-Tafsir al-Muyassar (The Simplified Commentary) · Al-An'am 6:28 our rendering · Open the passage
9 Whoever supposes that He treats opposites as equals, or distinguishes between two things equal in every respect, or that He voids the acts of obedience of a long life, sincere and sound, because of one grave sin committed after them — so that the doer of those acts abides in the Fire for ever and ever on account of that one sin, and all his obedience is voided by it, and He makes him abide in the punishment just as He makes abide the man who does not believe in Him for the blink of an eye and who has spent the hours of his life in what angers Him and in enmity to His messengers and His religion — such a man has thought ill of Him.
Ibn al-Qayyim · Zad al-Ma'ad fi Hady Khayr al-Ibad (Provisions for the Hereafter), p. 208 our rendering · Open the passage
10 There is a difficulty in this verse, in His saying, Mighty and Majestic, that they abide there for ages, while they do not come out of it. The best of what has been said about it is that Qatada said: abiding there for ages that have no end … We asked Abu al-Abbas Muhammad ibn Yazid about the saying of God, Mighty and Majestic, that they abide there for ages, and he said: what does this limit mean? For when we set a limit to a thing and say, 'I shall stay with you for a day', the force of the speech is that you will not stay beyond that day. Then he did not answer us about it for some thirty-odd years.
Abu Ja'far al-Nahhas · I'rab al-Qur'an (The Grammatical Analysis of the Qur'an), p. 81 our rendering · Open the passage
11 1. The objection strikes the structure as I described it, and I grant it. If what awaits the man who leaves it is a punishment without end, then the frame of 'the medicine and the doctor' does not describe the relation. And I do not mend the comparison with a patch; I strike it out. … 3. And I give notice of what I do not hold: I am in no position to tell you 'the punishment is not everlasting', nor 'it is everlasting for certain', and so settle a question in which there is a dispute among the people of learning, early and late — and the settling of it is not the work of this book nor within the competence of its writer. And whoever has given you a one-line answer in this matter has given you his own opinion in the dress of religion. … 5. And honesty in this matter requires it to be said: this is an objection I have not answered.
19. Why worship? — When did you begin to doubt? · Open the passage
12 So God, Mighty and Majestic, made it known that if they were sent back they would return, because they had already disbelieved after the proof had become binding upon them.
al-Zajjaj · Ma'ani al-Qur'an wa-I'rabuh (The Meanings of the Qur'an and Its Grammar), p. 239 our rendering · Open the passage
13 And the Book is placed, and thou seest the guilty fearful of that which is therein, and they say: What kind of a Book is this that leaveth not a small thing nor a great thing but hath counted it! And they find all that they did confronting them, and thy Lord wrongeth no-one.
Surah Al-Kahf (The Cave) 18:49 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
14 The record of each one's deeds is placed in his right hand or in his left, and you see the disobedient afraid of what is in it because of the crimes they sent ahead, saying when they look upon it: our ruin! What is it with this record, that it has left nothing of our doings, small or great, without setting it down? And they find everything they did in this world present and recorded. And your Lord wrongs no one by the weight of an atom: no obedient person has his reward reduced, and no disobedient person has his punishment increased.
al-Tafsir al-Muyassar (The Simplified Commentary) · Al-Kahf 18:49 our rendering · Open the passage
15 God, Mighty and Majestic, said: My mercy has outstripped My wrath.
Abu Hurayrah · Muslim · Sahih Muslim 2751 · sahih (authentic) our rendering
16 God does not wrong a believer of a single good deed: he is given for it in this world and rewarded for it in the hereafter. As for the unbeliever, he is fed in this world for the good deeds he did for God's sake, until, when he passes on to the hereafter, he has no good deed left for which he might be rewarded.
Anas ibn Malik · Muslim · Sahih Muslim 2808 · sahih (authentic) our rendering
God, Mighty and Majestic, said: My mercy has outstripped My wrath.
Abu Hurayrah · Muslim · Sahih Muslim 2751 · sahih (authentic) our rendering
God does not wrong a believer of a single good deed: he is given for it in this world and rewarded for it in the hereafter. As for the unbeliever, he is fed in this world for the good deeds he did for God's sake, until, when he passes on to the hereafter, he has no good deed left for which he might be rewarded.
Anas ibn Malik · Muslim · Sahih Muslim 2808 · sahih (authentic) our rendering
The strongest objection
This moves the punishment from the act to the intention, and that is worse, not lighter. "If they were sent back they would return" is a verdict on an act that never happened: the man is made to abide for ever for what he would have done had he lived for ever, not for what he did in seventy years. A real offence can be counted, measured and answered for; a supposed outcome can be neither counted nor answered for — no one has any way of proving he would not have gone back. And the claim of proportion collapses on a single phrase in the commentary on that same verse: the ages "do not come to an end". What proportion is there between an act that ends and a recompense that does not? As for "My mercy has outstripped My wrath" — a mercy whose effect never reaches the man who never gets out is a claim with nothing to show for it.
The verse does not make the supposed outcome the ground of the sentence; it uses that outcome to refute the deniers' own claim that if they were sent back they would believe. That is why it ends "Lo! they are liars" 7. Al-Zajjaj traces the cause back to what did happen, not to what did not: "So God, Mighty and Majestic, made it known that if they were sent back they would return, because they had already disbelieved after the proof had become binding upon them" 12. And the record judged by is a record of deeds, not of possibilities: it "leaveth not a small thing nor a great thing but hath counted it" 13 — "no obedient person has his reward reduced, and no disobedient person has his punishment increased" 14. The effect of mercy here is measured, not merely asserted: "My mercy has outstripped My wrath" 15, and even the unbeliever is not shortchanged for the good he did — he "is fed in this world for the good deeds he did for God's sake" 16. The settling of accounts does take place; what runs out afterwards is his own balance. As for the last part of your objection — proportion between what ends and what does not — it stands at full strength, and the site's book grants it outright: "this is an objection I have not answered" 11. What is claimed here is only this: proportion is affirmed in the text rather than rejected by it, and the measure of the offence is not the offender's lifespan. Not that the difficulty of duration has been resolved.
-
If there is a God who is all-powerful, all-knowing and merciful, then what accounts for all this suffering?
There is no answer here that touches your two cases, and that is the first thing to be said, not the last: the book devotes a whole chapter to your question in that very wording, and closes it with "why this particular measure? Why this particular child? I do not know. And I know of no one who knows" 1. Your rejection of the free-will answer is well placed, and the chapter rejects it along with you on the same ground: "the girl was killed by a free act, and the answer explains why the killer was not prevented from choosing, and says nothing at all about why the outcome was not turned away from her once he had chosen" 2. And your fawn is heavier than that: the chapter tabulates its four answers against your two cases and hides no zero in the table, and nothing there touches the fawn but "skeptical theism" 3 — and then it declares that answer's two limits itself: whoever does not know the wisdom may equally fail to know the goodness, and an argument that silences the objection silences with it every call for rescue 4. What the text itself says is not an explanation that fills this gap: "He will not be questioned as to that which He doeth, but they will be questioned" 5, "He is not questioned about His decree among His creation" 6. So what is promised is not that you will understand but that you be given justice 7: "and thy Lord wrongeth no-one" 8, "no obedient man is given less than his reward, and no disobedient man is given more than his punishment" 9. In the girl's case this promise breaks down into three claims that can be true or false — that what happened to her is not the last word on her; that the one who wronged her will have it taken from him; and that what she bore is not left out of the reckoning of her 7 — and the nearest thing in the Sunnah to the third is a text whose subject is the adult Muslim under obligation, not a child and not an animal: "No fatigue, nor disease… befalls a Muslim, but that God expiates some of his sins by it" 10. As for the fawn, there is nothing: "I have nothing definite on it… and I will not manufacture a justice for the fawn in order to complete a table with it" 7.
1 As for your own question, my answer to it is one: why this particular measure? Why this particular child? I do not know. And I know of no one who knows. And everyone who has told you otherwise either did not understand your question, or judged his own silence to weigh on him more heavily than words he does not possess.
12. The heaviest question in the field · Open the passage
2 And Rowe's second case shows the limit to be wider still: the girl was killed by a free act, and the answer explains why the killer was not prevented from choosing, and says nothing at all about why the outcome was not turned away from her once he had chosen.
12. The heaviest question in the field · Open the passage
3 A reader who has passed through four answers, each with a 'strength' and a 'limit', comes away with the impression that he has been given something in every case, and that is not true. Here is the table, and I hide no zero in it… So the sum of it: Rowe's version in the fawn is touched by nothing but skeptical theism — with its two declared limits… And whoever read the chapter and came away thinking that the four answers divide the cases between them has read something other than what is in it.
12. The heaviest question in the field · Open the passage
4 Its first limit — and it is the one that kills the answer from within: whoever says 'I do not know the wisdom in it' may equally fail to know its goodness. For if my faculties are too weak to see the good hidden in the burning of a fawn, they are too weak to judge that what I see of kindness is kindness in the overall reckoning… Its second limit — and it is the most famous reply made to it, and I dropped it in the first version: moral paralysis… And an argument that silences the objection silences with it every call for rescue.
12. The heaviest question in the field · Open the passage
5 He will not be questioned as to that which He doeth, but they will be questioned.
Surah al-Anbiya (The Prophets) 21:23 — Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
6 Among the proofs that He alone creates and He alone is to be worshipped is that He is not questioned about His decree among His creation, while all His creation are questioned about their deeds.
Al-Tafsir al-Muyassar · The Prophets 21:23 our rendering · Open the passage
7 And the last thing I say is not an argument; it is the setting straight of a promise. Religion does not promise you that you will understand. Nobody worth attending to has told you that you will be handed the file to read. What is promised is something else: that you be given justice… In the child: that the one who died was not annihilated — that what happened to him is not the last word on him; that the one who wronged him will have it taken from him; and that what he bore is not left out of the reckoning of him. These are three definite things that can be true or false, not a fine phrase. As for the fawn in the forest, I have nothing definite on it… and I will not manufacture a justice for the fawn in order to complete a table with it.
12. The heaviest question in the field · Open the passage
8 And the Book is placed, and thou seest the guilty fearful of that which is therein, and they say: What kind of a Book is this that leaveth not a small thing nor a great thing but hath counted it! And they find all that they did confronting them, and thy Lord wrongeth no-one.
Surah al-Kahf (The Cave) 18:49 — Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
9 The record of every person's deeds is placed in his right hand or in his left, and you see the sinners afraid of what is in it because of the crimes they sent ahead; and when they look upon it they say: Woe to us! What is this record that has left out nothing of our deeds, small or great, without setting it down? And they find everything they did in the world present and recorded. And your Lord wrongs no one by the weight of an atom: no obedient man is given less than his reward, and no disobedient man is given more than his punishment.
Al-Tafsir al-Muyassar · The Cave 18:49 our rendering · Open the passage
10 No fatigue, nor disease, nor anxiety, nor grief, nor hurt, nor distress befalls a Muslim — not even the prick of a thorn — but that God expiates some of his sins by it.
Abu Hurayrah · al-Bukhari · Sahih al-Bukhari 5641 · sahih our rendering
11 Each carries a different cost, and the heaviest is the first: if the support is a text that says of God that he is merciful, then I have established the mercy by the testimony of the accused — and that is a plain circle unless the truth of the report is established by a route that does not pass through its content. And I am not giving you one of the three in this chapter, and the effect of that on the weight of what is here is known: the answer remains conditional upon what has not yet been offered.
12. The heaviest question in the field · Open the passage
12 And what has not fallen: Rowe's version — in both its cases, the fawn and the child — and Draper's version. I have not answered them in this chapter, and I have nothing that answers them decisively.
12. The heaviest question in the field · Open the passage
No fatigue, nor disease, nor anxiety, nor grief, nor hurt, nor distress befalls a Muslim — not even the prick of a thorn — but that God expiates some of his sins by it.
Abu Hurayrah · al-Bukhari · Sahih al-Bukhari 5641 · sahih our rendering
How wonderful is the affair of the believer: his affair is all good, and that is so for no one but the believer. If ease comes to him he gives thanks, and that is good for him; and if hardship comes to him he bears it patiently, and that is good for him.
Suhayb ibn Sinan al-Rumi · Muslim · Sahih Muslim 2999 · sahih our rendering
The strongest objection
All of this is an admission of inability, and then a change of subject. The question was: what good was there that could not be had except by permitting this? The answer given is: I do not know, but she will be given justice. Justice is compensation, not justification — and the promise of compensation is taken from the very text under accusation, so the mercy of the accused is established by the accused's own testimony. As for "I do not know", it is not an answer but an open concession that the hypothesis is left exactly as improbable as it was, with the manners of admission put in the place of proof.
The first half of your objection is conceded in the chapter, in words sharper than your own: "if the support is a text that says of God that he is merciful, then I have established the mercy by the testimony of the accused — and that is a plain circle unless the truth of the report is established by a route that does not pass through its content", and it goes on to say that no such route is offered there, so "the answer remains conditional upon what has not yet been offered" 11. The promise is therefore an internal answer, binding on no one who does not accept the source of the report, and the dispute moves entire to establishing that the report is true by a route that does not pass through its content — and that is another matter, not opened in this place. The second half of your objection is not disputed at all: "And what has not fallen: Rowe's version — in both its cases, the fawn and the child — and Draper's version. I have not answered them in this chapter, and I have nothing that answers them decisively" 12. What remains is not a victory to be claimed: it is that the difference between a promise of understanding and a promise of justice is a difference that can be tested, and that the second is three definite claims that can be true or false, not a fine phrase said at a graveside 7.
-
A man honest and kind his whole life, who simply did not believe — are all his deeds voided and he burns for ever, while a wicked believer is saved?
No — and the claim breaks at both ends. Belonging saves no bad Muslim: "He who doeth wrong will have the recompense thereof, and will not find against Allah any protecting friend or helper" 1. The commentary reads this as saying that the thing is not attained "by the wishes you wish, O Muslims," but "by true faith in God Most High and by doing good work that pleases Him" 2. And the good an unbeliever does is neither denied nor docked: "We shall repay them their deeds herein, and therein they will not be wronged" 3; and in Sahih Muslim: "As for the unbeliever, he is fed in this world for the good deeds he did for God" 5 — the wage is paid out, not erased, and the dispute is over where it is paid, not over whether it is owed. What voids a deed in this account is not assent to a proposition in the head but the direction of the act and its intent: "their work was void, because it was not for the face of God" 4; and Ibn al-Qayyim's condition for acceptance is "that it be purely for His face and in accord with His law" 7. This measure falls on the Muslim first, not last: in Muslim's report a martyr, a scholar who taught and recited the Qur'an, and a great giver are each dragged on their faces into the Fire because their deeds were done "so that it would be said" of them, and Ibn Rajab reads over them the very verse — "We shall repay them their deeds herein" — that is recited over the unbeliever 11. A man who acts to be talked about loses his deed even if he dies a martyr 11; a man who acts for the face of God is accepted 7. That is a measure you may dispute. It is not a party card.
1 It will not be in accordance with your desires, nor the desires of the People of the Scripture. He who doeth wrong will have the recompense thereof, and will not find against Allah any protecting friend or helper.
Surah An-Nisa 4:123 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
2 This great favour is not attained by the wishes you wish, O Muslims, nor by the wishes of the People of the Scripture among the Jews and the Christians. It is attained only by true faith in God Most High and by doing good work that pleases Him. Whoever does an evil deed is requited for it, and he will find, apart from God Most High, no protector to take charge of his affair and no helper to help him and ward the evil of the punishment off him.
Tafsir al-Muyassar · An-Nisa 4:123 our rendering · Open the passage
3 Whoso desireth the life of the world and its pomp, We shall repay them their deeds herein, and therein they will not be wronged.
Surah Hud 11:15 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
4 Those people will have nothing in the Hereafter but the Fire of Hell, whose heat they will endure; the benefit of what they did has gone from them, and their work was void, because it was not for the face of God.
Tafsir al-Muyassar · Hud 11:16 our rendering · Open the passage
5 God does not wrong a believer a single good deed: he is given for it in this world and rewarded for it in the Hereafter. As for the unbeliever, he is fed in this world for the good deeds he did for God, until, when he passes on to the Hereafter, he has no good deed left for which to be rewarded.
Anas ibn Malik · Muslim · Sahih Muslim 2808 · sahih (authentic) our rendering
6 I said: Messenger of God, Ibn Jud'an in the age of ignorance used to keep ties of kinship and feed the poor — will that help him? He said: It will not help him; he never said one day: My Lord, forgive me my sin on the Day of Judgement.
Aisha, Mother of the Believers · Muslim · Sahih Muslim 214 · sahih (authentic) our rendering
7 He, exalted be He, likened their deeds — in their collapse and their going for nothing, like scattered dust, since they rested on no foundation of faith and right doing, and were done for other than God, mighty and majestic, and not by His command — to ashes scattered by a storm wind, so that their owner can lay hold of none of them at the hour of his greatest need of them… For God accepts of a work only what is purely for His face and in accord with His law. Deeds are four: one accepted and three rejected. The accepted is the one that is pure and correct: pure, that it be for God and not for another; correct, that it be of what God has laid down on the tongue of His Messenger. The three rejected are those that fall short of that.
Ibn al-Qayyim al-Jawziyya · I'lam al-Muwaqqi'in 'an Rabb al-'Alamin, p. 130 our rendering · Open the passage
8 He said: So I said, By God, I will not leave a single thing I did in the age of ignorance without doing its like in Islam. This shows that the good deeds of an unbeliever, if he becomes a Muslim, are rewarded — as the hadith of Abu Sa'id given earlier also shows.
Ibn Rajab al-Hanbali · Jami' al-'Ulum wa'l-Hikam, p. 296 our rendering · Open the passage
9 Whosoever goeth right, it is only for (the good of) his own soul that he goeth right, and whosoever erreth, erreth only to its hurt. No laden soul can bear another's load, We never punish until we have sent a messenger.
Surah Al-Isra 17:15 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
10 Whoever is guided and follows the path of truth, the reward of that returns to him alone; and whoever swerves and follows the path of falsehood, the punishment of that returns to him alone. No sinful soul bears the sin of another sinful soul. And God punishes no one until the case has been established against him by the sending of messengers and the sending down of books.
Tafsir al-Muyassar · Al-Isra 17:15 our rendering · Open the passage
11 Muslim reported, from the hadith of Abu Hurayra, may God be pleased with him: I heard the Prophet, God bless him and grant him peace, say: "The first of people to be judged on the Day of Resurrection will be a man who was martyred… He will say: You lie; rather you fought so that it would be said, He is bold — and it was said. Then the order will be given for him, and he will be dragged on his face until he is cast into the Fire. And a man who learned knowledge and taught it, and recited the Qur'an… He will say: You lie; rather you learned knowledge so that it would be said, He is a scholar, and you recited the Qur'an so that it would be said, He is a reciter — and it was said. Then the order will be given for him, and he will be dragged on his face until he is cast into the Fire. And a man to whom God gave abundance, and gave him of every kind of wealth… He will say: You lie; rather you did it so that it would be said, He is generous — and it was said. Then the order will be given for him, and he will be dragged on his face until he is cast into the Fire." … God, mighty and majestic, said: "Whoso desireth the life of the world and its pomp, We shall repay them their deeds herein, and therein they will not be wronged — Those are they for whom is naught in the Hereafter save the Fire" [Hud: 15–16].
Ibn Rajab al-Hanbali · Jami' al-'Ulum wa'l-Hikam, p. 76 our rendering · Open the passage
God does not wrong a believer a single good deed: he is given for it in this world and rewarded for it in the Hereafter. As for the unbeliever, he is fed in this world for the good deeds he did for God, until, when he passes on to the Hereafter, he has no good deed left for which to be rewarded.
Anas ibn Malik · Muslim · Sahih Muslim 2808 · sahih (authentic) our rendering
I said: Messenger of God, Ibn Jud'an in the age of ignorance used to keep ties of kinship and feed the poor — will that help him? He said: It will not help him; he never said one day: My Lord, forgive me my sin on the Day of Judgement.
Aisha, Mother of the Believers · Muslim · Sahih Muslim 214 · sahih (authentic) our rendering
The strongest objection
This moves the problem, it does not solve it. You made the doctor's wage some comfort in his own lifetime and then burned him for ever, and the question was about the forever, not about this life. Paying the wage "here" instead of "there" is not justice; it is settling accounts before an execution. And your line "it was not for the face of God" is the accusation itself, not an answer to it: you are judging the inward direction, which is the most private thing in the head and the furthest thing from the hand. So the measure stands exactly where it stood, and only its name has changed — from "he assented to a claim" to "he aimed in the right direction" — and both are loyalty, not work.
The first restriction is that the punishment does not fall at all on someone the case never reached: "We never punish until we have sent a messenger" 9 — "God punishes no one until the case has been established against him by the sending of messengers and the sending down of books" 10. So the hinge is not that he failed to assent; it is that he refused after the case had been established against him. The second is that in the most famous version of this question the stated reason is not the man's conduct but his stance toward the reckoning itself. Asked about Ibn Jud'an, who "used to keep ties of kinship and feed the poor," the answer was: "It will not help him; he never said one day, My Lord, forgive me my sin on the Day of Judgement" 6 — his kindness was not denied him; what was held against him was that he never once acknowledged a Day of Judgement. The third is that a deed is not erased for the identity of the one who did it: a man who came to faith was rewarded for the good he had done before it, and "this shows that the good deeds of an unbeliever, if he becomes a Muslim, are rewarded" 8 — what turns is the direction of the deed, not the person of the doer. What remains after this is not hidden: a man whom the case reached, who understood it and refused it, has his work rejected in the Hereafter, and that is one of four categories in Ibn al-Qayyim: "Deeds are four: one accepted and three rejected" 7 — and three of those four strike the Muslim exactly as they strike anyone else 11. So the honest place of dispute is that one category alone, not the claim that the reckoning runs on loyalty.
-
A man who lived and died without the message ever reaching him — what happens to him?
No. There are not two parts here but three, and the Qur'an settles your second part in its own words: "We never punish until we have sent a messenger" 1. Tafsir al-Muyassar gives the sense: "God punishes no one until the proof has been established against him by the sending of messengers and the sending down of books" 2. The jurists took this as a general operating rule, not as an exception carved out for a hard case: "whoever did not know of God's obligation, and whom the call did not reach, and who had no way of learning of it from anyone else — that obligation is not binding upon him, and the proof does not stand against him" 3. As for your first part — "if they are saved, what was the point of sending a message?" — the man in the forest is not handed an acquittal; he is tested: "Four will plead on the Day of Resurrection… a man who died in the interval between prophets… Lord, no messenger of Yours came to me. So He will take their pledges that they will obey Him, and will send them a messenger: enter the Fire" 4. The test is a real one, not a formality, and people divide over it: "the scholars of hadith agreed that they are tested on the Day of Resurrection: whoever obeys enters the Garden, and whoever disobeys enters the Fire" 5. Being reached by the message is the condition for liability, not the condition for being tested, and that is why messengers were sent at all: "Messengers of good cheer and of warning, in order that mankind might have no argument against Allah after the messengers" 6. So a man whom nothing reached has the argument on his side, not against him 1.
1 Whosoever goeth right, it is only for (the good of) his own soul that he goeth right, and whosoever erreth, erreth only to its hurt. No laden soul can bear another's load, We never punish until we have sent a messenger.
Surah Al-Isra 17:15 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
2 Whoever is guided and follows the path of truth, the reward of that returns to him alone; and whoever turns aside and follows the path of falsehood, the punishment of that returns to him alone. No guilty soul bears the sin of another guilty soul. And God punishes no one until the proof has been established against him by the sending of messengers and the sending down of books.
Tafsir al-Muyassar · Surah Al-Isra 17:15 our rendering · Open the passage
3 In this is evidence that whoever did not know of God's obligation, and whom the call did not reach, and who had no way of learning of it from anyone else — that obligation is not binding upon him, and the proof does not stand against him; the obligation becomes binding upon him only when he comes to know it, and the proof stands against him only when he is able to learn of it.
Al-Tahawi · Ahkam al-Qur'an al-Karim, p. 277 our rendering · Open the passage
4 Four will plead on the Day of Resurrection: a deaf man, a man without reason, a very old man, and a man who died in the interval between prophets. The deaf man will say: Lord, Islam came and I heard nothing. The man without reason will say: Lord, Islam came and the children were pelting me with dung. The old man will say: Lord, Islam came and I could not understand. And the one who died in the interval will say: Lord, no messenger of Yours came to me. So He will take their pledges that they will obey Him, and will send them a messenger: enter the Fire. He said: By Him in whose hand my soul is, had they entered it, it would have been coolness and peace for them.
Al-Aswad ibn Sari' · Ibn Hibban · Sahih Ibn Hibban 7357 · sahih (authentic) our rendering
5 He (peace be upon him) was asked about those who die among the children of the idolaters, and he said: God knows best what they would have done. This is not a suspension of judgement, as some have supposed, nor is it a statement that God will requite them for what He knows they would have done had they lived. It is a decisive answer: God knows what they would have done, and will requite them for what He knows of them according to what appears from them on the Day of Resurrection, not on the strength of His knowledge alone — as the rest of the hadiths state explicitly, and the scholars of hadith agreed that they are tested on the Day of Resurrection: whoever obeys enters the Garden, and whoever disobeys enters the Fire.
Ibn al-Qayyim · I'lam al-Muwaqqi'in 'an Rabb al-'Alamin, p. 208 our rendering · Open the passage
6 Messengers of good cheer and of warning, in order that mankind might have no argument against Allah after the messengers. Allah was ever Mighty, Wise.
Surah An-Nisa 4:165 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
7 And it is evidence that whoever dies an idolater is in the Fire, even if he died before the prophetic mission; because the idolaters had altered the pure monotheism, the religion of Abraham, and had put idolatry in its place and committed it, with no proof from God for it. Its ugliness, and the threat of the Fire for it, never ceased to be known from the religion of all the messengers, from the first of them to the last … And though He, glorified be He, does not punish on the strength of this innate disposition alone, the call of the messengers to the oneness of God never ceased to be known to the people of the earth; so the idolater deserves punishment for his going against the call of the messengers. And God knows best.
Ibn al-Qayyim · Zad al-Ma'ad fi Hady Khayr al-'Ibad, p. 598 our rendering · Open the passage
Four will plead on the Day of Resurrection: a deaf man, a man without reason, a very old man, and a man who died in the interval between prophets. The deaf man will say: Lord, Islam came and I heard nothing. The man without reason will say: Lord, Islam came and the children were pelting me with dung. The old man will say: Lord, Islam came and I could not understand. And the one who died in the interval will say: Lord, no messenger of Yours came to me. So He will take their pledges that they will obey Him, and will send them a messenger: enter the Fire. He said: By Him in whose hand my soul is, had they entered it, it would have been coolness and peace for them.
Al-Aswad ibn Sari' · Ibn Hibban · Sahih Ibn Hibban 7357 · sahih (authentic) our rendering
The hadiths on the testing of the man without reason and of the one who died in the interval between prophets.
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani · Fath al-Bari 3/291 · sahih (authentic) our rendering
The strongest objection
The test is an escape route built after the difficulty appeared, not a doctrine anyone actually holds: the rule is asserted in debate and then dropped when the verdict is passed — Ibn al-Qayyim himself states flatly that "whoever dies an idolater is in the Fire, even if he died before the prophetic mission." And a test on the Day of Resurrection is a report about the unseen: it can be neither verified nor falsified. It buys justice at a price nobody pays.
The second point is sound, and nothing here pushes back on it: the test is a report, not something experience can check. The most that can be said is that the rule carrying it is laid down in the text from the outset, and is the stated reason for sending messengers in the first place — it was not improvised as an answer 1 6. The first point, however, quotes Ibn al-Qayyim's sentence cut away from the reason standing right next to it. He builds the ruling on the fact that the call had reached those people and they altered it — "because the idolaters had altered the pure monotheism, the religion of Abraham, and had put idolatry in its place" — and in the same passage he says plainly, "though He, glorified be He, does not punish on the strength of this innate disposition alone," and traces the deserving of punishment to "his going against the call of the messengers" 7. So the dispute is over a fact, not over a rule: did the call reach them or not? And the man in your forest falls outside the disputed ground by the wording of the third condition: "and who had no way of learning of it from anyone else" 3.
-
If he knew before creating me that I would disbelieve and be damned, what choice did I ever have — and what am I judged for?
The verse is usually quoted in a way that turns it around. "And ye will not" is half of a sentence, and its first half affirms that you do will: "Unto whomsoever of you willeth to walk straight." The two verses stand side by side in the same surah 1, and Tafsir al-Muyassar reads them as one sentence: the willing is ascribed to you, and the power for it to come about is His 2. The idolaters' argument was not left standing either. They did not merely say "Had Allah willed" 3; they added to it the claim that He "was pleased with it from you and loved it for you" — and that is the conjecture they were answered for 4. The plain answer comes in the verse right after it: "Say - For Allah's is the final argument - Had He willed He could indeed have guided all of you." 5 As for what you are judged for, it is bounded by your capacity and by what you yourself earn: "Allah tasketh not a soul beyond its scope. For it (is only) that which it hath earned, and against it (only) that which it hath deserved." 6 And there is no punishment at all before the proof has been established 7. Ibn al-Qayyim reads the very verse you are citing, quotes it, and then comes out with the opposite of what you come out with: two wills — a will from you to act, and a will from Him to aid you — and he closes with "whoever comes without a vessel goes back deprived, and let him blame none but himself" 8. Your question was put in its own words in a report Ibn Rajab transmits: "Then what is the point of action?" The answer was "Work" 9.
1 Unto whomsoever of you willeth to walk straight.
Surah At-Takwir (The Overthrowing) 81:28-29 · Open the passage
2 … for whoever among you wills to keep straight upon the truth and upon faith. And you do not will that straightness, nor are you able to bring it about, except by the will of Allah, Lord of all creatures.
Tafsir al-Muyassar - At-Takwir 81:28-29 our rendering · Open the passage
3 They who are idolaters will say: Had Allah willed, we had not ascribed (unto Him) partners neither had our fathers, nor had we forbidden aught. Thus did those who were before them give the lie (to Allah's messengers) till they tasted of the fear of Us. Say: Have ye any knowledge that ye can adduce for Us? Lo! ye follow naught but an opinion, Lo! ye do but guess.
Surah Al-An'am (The Cattle) 6:148 · Open the passage
4 … Say to them, Messenger: do you have any sound knowledge — about the cattle and crops you have forbidden, and about your claim that Allah willed unbelief for you, and was pleased with it from you and loved it for you — that you can bring out for us? In the affairs of this religion you follow nothing but conjecture, and you do nothing but lie.
Tafsir al-Muyassar - Al-An'am 6:148 our rendering · Open the passage
5 Say - For Allah's is the final argument - Had He willed He could indeed have guided all of you.
Surah Al-An'am (The Cattle) 6:149 · Open the passage
6 Allah tasketh not a soul beyond its scope. For it (is only) that which it hath earned, and against it (only) that which it hath deserved. Our Lord! Condemn us not if we forget, or miss the mark! Our Lord! Lay not on us such a burden as thou didst lay on those before us! Our Lord! Impose not on us that which we have not the strength to bear! Pardon us, absolve us and have mercy on us, Thou, our Protector, and give us victory over the disbelieving folk.
Surah Al-Baqara (The Cow) 2:286 · Open the passage
7 Whoever is guided and follows the path of truth, the reward of that comes back to him alone; and whoever turns aside and follows the path of falsehood, the punishment of that comes back to him alone. No guilty soul bears the sin of another guilty soul. And Allah punishes no one until the proof has been established against him by the sending of the messengers and the sending down of the scriptures.
Tafsir al-Muyassar - Al-Isra (The Night Journey) 17:15 our rendering · Open the passage
8 The Lord, Exalted be He, wills of His servant that he act, and the act does not come to pass until He, Glorified be He, wills of Himself that He aid him… So they are two wills: a will of His servant that he act, and a will of Himself that He aid him. The servant has no way to the act except by this will, and he owns nothing of it, as Allah said: "And ye will not, unless (it be) that Allah willeth, the Lord of Creation"… And he has no vessel with him for the gift to be placed in, so whoever comes without a vessel goes back deprived, and let him blame none but himself.
Ibn al-Qayyim - Zad al-Ma'ad, p. 328 our rendering · Open the passage
9 It also reports, from Jabir, that a man said: Messenger of Allah, in what does action lie today? In what the pens have dried upon and the decrees have run with, or in what is still to come? He said: No, rather in what the pens have dried upon and the decrees have run with. The man said: Then what is the point of action? He said: Work, for each is made ready for that for which he was created.
Ibn Rajab - Jami' al-'Ulum wa al-Hikam, p. 482 our rendering · Open the passage
10 Belief in the decree has two degrees. The first is the belief that Allah, Exalted be He, knew beforehand what His servants would do of good and evil, obedience and disobedience, before He created them and brought them into being… and that He prepared reward and punishment for them as a recompense for their deeds, before He created and formed them… The second degree is that Allah created all the acts of His servants — unbelief, faith, obedience and disobedience — and willed them from them. This degree the people of the Sunna and the community affirm, and the Qadariyya deny.
Ibn Rajab - Jami' al-'Ulum wa al-Hikam, p. 102 our rendering · Open the passage
11 By Allah, besides whom there is no god, one of you will do the deeds of the people of Paradise until there is no more than a cubit between him and it, then the writing outstrips him and he does the deeds of the people of the Fire and enters it; and one of you will do the deeds of the people of the Fire until there is no more than a cubit between him and it, then the writing outstrips him and he does the deeds of the people of Paradise and enters it. Reported by al-Bukhari and Muslim.
Ibn Rajab - Jami' al-'Ulum wa al-Hikam, p. 152 our rendering · Open the passage
12 Had Allah, Exalted be He, willed that these idolaters not associate partners with Him, they would not have associated any; but He, Exalted be He, knows what will come of their evil choice and their following of their deviant desires.
Tafsir al-Muyassar - Al-An'am 6:107 our rendering · Open the passage
13 Had Allah known of any good in them He would have made them hear, but had He made them hear they would have turned away, averse.
Surah Al-Anfal (The Spoils of War) 8:23 · Open the passage
14 Lo! We have shown him the way, whether he be grateful or disbelieving.
Surah Al-Insan (Man) 76:3 · Open the passage
The strongest objection
This restates the problem; it does not solve it. The "vessel" I am asked to bring needs aid of its own, and Ibn al-Qayyim says in that same line that the servant "owns nothing of it" [[8]] — so what separates me from the one who is saved is His giving, not my doing. Then you grant that "Had He willed He could indeed have guided all of you" [[5]], and that had your Lord willed, everyone on earth would have believed, every one of them [[10]] — and He did not. So the remainder is His choice, not mine. And your own books say that He "created all the acts of His servants — unbelief, faith… — and willed them from them" [[11]], and that the writing outstrips a man who is one cubit from Paradise, so that he does the deeds of the people of the Fire and enters it [[12]]. Nothing is left to me but to carry out what was written and then be judged for it.
The answer is in the very sentence the objection is built on. Tafsir al-Muyassar explains "Had Allah willed, they had not been idolatrous" by saying that He "knows what will come of their evil choice and their following of their deviant desires" 12 — so the willing and the choosing are joined in one sentence, not placed one after the other in it. And the knowledge is described in the text as knowledge of what is in them: "Had Allah known of any good in them He would have made them hear" 13. Both roads are announced and both are left open, out of one and the same guidance: "Lo! We have shown him the way, whether he be grateful or disbelieving." 14 The text you cited describes what is written there as reward and punishment, "as a recompense for their deeds" 10, and the report you cited carries both directions, not the direction of ruin alone 11. What is not claimed here: these texts contain no account of how the two wills meet, and no claim is made to hold anything that closes that gap. What is transmitted is that when the question was put, the answer was an action and not an explanation: "Work, for each is made ready for that for which he was created." 9
-
Why were we created for a test at all? Why not create us in paradise to begin with?
Yes — it is a test whose outcome the tester already knows. The texts say so before you do, and they do not hide it: the Prophet was asked, "Is it known who the people of Paradise are and who the people of the Fire are?" He said, "Yes." It was said, "Then what are those who act working for?" He answered, "Everyone is made ready for that for which he was created." 1 The answer was not that the knowing produces the act. Ibn Rajab reads the same hadith and holds that what was written down beforehand is "determined in accordance with deeds" 2 — that is, the writing follows the act and does not create it. And the stated purpose is not to obtain information God lacks: "that He may try you which of you is best in conduct" 3, which the commentary reads as "which of you is best in deed and most sincere in it" 4. So the trial brings the act into existence, not into knowledge — and that is a description you and they share. As for "I never signed anything": the text does not dodge it, it claims a covenant already taken — "and made them testify of themselves, (saying): Am I not your Lord?" 5 — and then ties punishment to an external condition: "We never punish until we have sent a messenger." 6 Ibn al-Qayyim states this as a general rule: "God, exalted be He, does not punish anyone until the proof has been established against him." 7 As for "why not paradise from the start", that is the heaviest of the three. The strongest answer offered is that the world is "a place in which persons are formed", not "a pleasure-house badly made" 8 — and its limit is stated openly in the book, not hidden: "pain that kills its bearer does not build him. A child who dies in his second year has had no character made for him." 9
1 It was said: O Messenger of God, is it known who the people of Paradise are and who the people of the Fire are? He said: Yes. It was said: Then what are those who act working for? He said: Everyone is made ready for that for which he was created.
Imran ibn Husayn · Muslim · Sahih Muslim 2649 · Sound (sahih) our rendering
2 This hadith states that felicity and wretchedness were already written down beforehand, that this is determined in accordance with deeds, and that each person is made ready for what he was created for among the deeds that are a cause of felicity or of wretchedness.
Ibn Rajab al-Hanbali · Jami' al-'Ulum wa'l-Hikam, p. 168 our rendering · Open the passage
3 Who hath created life and death that He may try you which of you is best in conduct; and He is the Mighty, the Forgiving,
Surat al-Mulk (The Sovereignty) 67:2 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
4 He who created death and life, to test you — O people — as to which of you is best in deed and most sincere in it. And He is the Mighty, whom nothing can defeat, the Forgiving to those of His servants who repent. In the verse there is an encouragement to acts of obedience and a deterrent from committing sins.
al-Tafsir al-Muyassar · Surat al-Mulk (The Sovereignty) 67:2 our rendering · Open the passage
5 And (remember) when thy Lord brought forth from the Children of Adam, from their reins, their seed, and made them testify of themselves, (saying): Am I not your Lord? They said: Yea, verily. We testify. (That was) lest ye should say at the Day of Resurrection: Lo! of this we were unaware;
Surat al-A'raf (The Heights) 7:172 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
6 Whosoever goeth right, it is only for (the good of) his own soul that he goeth right, and whosoever erreth, erreth only to its hurt. No laden soul can bear another's load, We never punish until we have sent a messenger.
Surat al-Isra' (The Night Journey) 17:15 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
7 What he — may God bless him and grant him peace — meant by their being of them is that they follow them in the rulings of this world and in the absence of liability, not that they follow them in the punishment of the hereafter; for God, exalted be He, does not punish anyone until the proof has been established against him.
Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya · I'lam al-Muwaqqi'in 'an Rabb al-'Alamin, p. 206 our rendering · Open the passage
8 A world in which nothing hurts is a world in which there is no patience, no courage, no mercy and no self-sacrifice — not because the people in it are wicked, but because these things are measured against what stands opposite them, so that the forms of them we know fall away. … And this is John Hick's position in 'soul-making': that the world is not a pleasure-house badly made, but a place in which persons are formed
The Heaviest Question in the Matter — 6(b) Soul-building: John Hick's 'soul-making' · Open the passage
9 Its limit — and it is the harshest thing in the whole matter: pain that kills its bearer does not build him. A child who dies in his second year has had no character made for him. And some people come out of affliction harder and narrower, not more merciful and larger, and this is seen and not to be denied.
The Heaviest Question in the Matter — the limit of the soul-building answer · Open the passage
10 And when thy Lord said unto the angels: Lo! I am about to place a viceroy in the earth, they said: Wilt thou place therein one who will do harm therein and will shed blood, while we, we hymn Thy praise and sanctify Thee? He said: Surely I know that which ye know not.
Surat al-Baqara (The Cow) 2:30 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
11 We said: Go down, all of you, from hence; but verily there cometh unto you from Me a guidance; and whoso followeth My guidance, there shall no fear come upon them neither shall they grieve.
Surat al-Baqara (The Cow) 2:38 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
It was said: O Messenger of God, is it known who the people of Paradise are and who the people of the Fire are? He said: Yes. It was said: Then what are those who act working for? He said: Everyone is made ready for that for which he was created.
Imran ibn Husayn · Muslim · Sahih Muslim 2649 · Sound (sahih) our rendering
I said: O Messenger of God, what are those who act working for? He said: Everyone is made ready for that for which he was created.
Imran ibn Husayn · al-Bukhari · Sahih al-Bukhari 7551 · Sound (sahih) our rendering
The strongest objection
"Determined in accordance with deeds" is a circle, not an answer: if the writing follows the act, then who made wretchedness easy for the one it was made easy for? And a covenant that nobody remembers is not a covenant but a patch applied after the hole appeared — what court enforces a contract against someone who does not know he signed it? And conceding that the trial "brings an act into existence" admits the charge rather than answering it: a play whose script is already written, with a fire at the end of it that never stops. The difference between that and injustice is purely verbal.
The first part stops at a limit that cannot be crossed — and it is their own text that stops there. The Quran records this very question in the mouth of the angels, "Wilt thou place therein one who will do harm therein and will shed blood", and then answers it not with an argument but with a claim to knowledge: "Surely I know that which ye know not." 10 That is an open halt, and anyone who counts it as a proof is committing a fallacy. The second part is not settled by the covenant alone, and they do not hang punishment on it in the first place: they hang it on a messenger reaching you, not on remembering a pact 6 7 — so on their account you answer for what reached you, not for what you cannot remember. And the third: their claim is that the origin was paradise, not the earth, and that the descent was paired with a promise of guidance, "Go down, all of you, from hence; but verily there cometh unto you from Me a guidance" 11 — so on their telling the earth is a passage, not a starting point. This is a narrative, not a proof, and you have been told that it is a narrative; nothing more has been claimed for it.
-
How can bones that have crumbled to dust be reassembled — bodies eaten by fish or turned to ash?
No — and you are not the first to raise it. The Quran states the objection in the words of the one who makes it, not in the words of the one answering it: "And they say: When we are bones and fragments, shall we forsooth, be raised up as a new creation?" 1. The man behind its most famous version, Ubayy ibn Khalaf, brought decayed bones, "crumbled them and scattered them in the air," and then put his question 2 — that is, he produced the crumbling and the dispersal with his own hand before arguing from them: "Who will revive these bones when they have rotted away?" 3. The answer the text gives does not claim to trace atoms: "Say: He will revive them Who produced them at the first, for He is Knower of every creation" 4 — "He will give them life Who created them the first time, and He knows all His creation; nothing is hidden from Him" 5. Your intermingled atoms are covered by a wording of their own: "We know that which the earth taketh of them, and with Us is a recording Book" 6 — "what the earth takes away and consumes of their bodies… and with Us is a preserved Book" 7 — so what holds the person together, on this account, is knowledge and a record. And the claim runs down to fine detail: "Yea, verily. We are Able to restore his very fingers!" 8 — the fingertips, that is, "after gathering and joining them — a well-formed creation, just as they were before death" 9. As for fish and fire, both are addressed by name. A man left instructions that he be burned, then ground up, then scattered — half in the sea and half on the land — and "Allah commanded the land and the sea, and they gathered him" 10. On the same subject a material remnant is also mentioned: "Every part of the son of Adam is consumed by the earth except the coccyx" 11. Both are set down here together because the account of the burned man applies precisely where no remnant is left at all, so neither one covers over the other. As for "show us one who has come back," the text offers two cases: a man of whom it says, "And Allah made him die a hundred years, then brought him back to life," and who was then told, "look at the bones, how We adjust them and then cover them with flesh!" 12; and Abraham, who asked your very question — "My Lord! Show me how Thou givest life to the dead" — and was answered with parts scattered over separate hills and then called back 13.
1 And they say: When we are bones and fragments, shall we forsooth, be raised up as a new creation?
Surah Al-Isra 17:49 · Open the passage
2 …It has been related that when Ubayy ibn Khalaf brought decayed bones, crumbled them and scattered them in the air, and said: O Muhammad, who will give life to bones when they have rotted away! — Allah Most High sent down: "Say: He will revive them Who produced them at the first, for He is Knower of every creation."
Badr al-Din al-Zarkashi · Al-Burhan fi Ulum al-Qur'an, p. 25 our rendering · Open the passage
3 And he hath coined for Us a similitude, and hath forgotten the fact of his creation, saying: Who will revive these bones when they have rotted away?
Surah Ya-Sin 36:78 · Open the passage
4 Say: He will revive them Who produced them at the first, for He is Knower of every creation,
Surah Ya-Sin 36:79 · Open the passage
5 Say to him: He will give them life Who created them the first time, and He knows all His creation; nothing is hidden from Him.
Al-Tafsir al-Muyassar — Ya-Sin 36:79 our rendering · Open the passage
6 We know that which the earth taketh of them, and with Us is a recording Book.
Surah Qaf 50:4 · Open the passage
7 We know what the earth takes away and consumes of their bodies, and with Us is a preserved Book, guarded from change and alteration, recording all that befalls them in their lives and after their death.
Al-Tafsir al-Muyassar — Qaf 50:4 our rendering · Open the passage
8 Yea, verily. We are Able to restore his very fingers!
Surah Al-Qiyamah 75:4 · Open the passage
9 …Does this disbelieving man suppose that We shall not be able to gather his bones after they have been scattered? Yes indeed — We shall gather them, being able to make his fingers, or his fingertips — after gathering and joining them — a well-formed creation, just as they were before death.
Al-Tafsir al-Muyassar — Al-Qiyamah 75:3–4 our rendering · Open the passage
10 "A man entered Paradise who had never done any good deed. When death came to him he said to his family: When I die, burn me, then grind me up, then scatter half of me in the sea and half of me on the land. So Allah commanded the land and the sea, and they gathered him. Then He said: What made you do what you did? He said: Fear of You. So He forgave him for that."
Abu Sa'id al-Khudri · Shu'ayb al-Arna'ut · Takhrij al-Musnad li-Shu'ayb 11096 · sahih (authentic) our rendering
11 Every part of the son of Adam is consumed by the earth except the coccyx: from it he was created, and in it he will be put together again.
Abu Hurayrah · Muslim · Sahih Muslim 2955 · sahih (authentic) our rendering
12 Or (bethink thee of) the like of him who, passing by a township which had fallen into utter ruin, exclaimed: How shall Allah give this township life after its death? And Allah made him die a hundred years, then brought him back to life. He said: How long hast thou tarried? (The man) said: I have tarried a day or part of a day. (He) said: Nay, but thou hast tarried for a hundred years. Just look at thy food and drink which have not rotted! Look at thine ass! And, that We may make thee a token unto mankind, look at the bones, how We adjust them and then cover them with flesh! And when (the matter) became clear unto him, he said: I know now that Allah is Able to do all things.
Surah Al-Baqarah 2:259 · Open the passage
13 And when Abraham said (unto his Lord): My Lord! Show me how Thou givest life to the dead, He said: Dost thou not believe? Abraham said: Yea, but (I ask) in order that my heart may be at ease. (His Lord) said: Take four of the birds and cause them to incline unto thee, then place a part of them on each hill, then call them, they will come to thee in haste, and know that Allah is Mighty, Wise.
Surah Al-Baqarah 2:260 · Open the passage
14 Remember — O Messenger — Abraham's asking his Lord to show him how the dead are raised… He said: Take four birds, draw them to yourself, slaughter them and cut them up, then place a part of them on each hill, then call them and they will come to you in haste. So Abraham, peace be upon him, called them, and behold, each part returned to its place, and they came hastening.
Al-Tafsir al-Muyassar — Al-Baqarah 2:260 our rendering · Open the passage
15 That We may transfigure you and make you what ye know not.
Surah Al-Waqi'ah 56:61 · Open the passage
Every part of the son of Adam is consumed by the earth except the coccyx: from it he was created, and in it he will be put together again.
Abu Hurayrah · Muslim · Sahih Muslim 2955 · sahih (authentic) our rendering
"A man entered Paradise who had never done any good deed. When death came to him he said to his family: When I die, burn me, then grind me up, then scatter half of me in the sea and half of me on the land. So Allah commanded the land and the sea, and they gathered him. Then He said: What made you do what you did? He said: Fear of You. So He forgave him for that."
Abu Sa'id al-Khudri · Shu'ayb al-Arna'ut · Takhrij al-Musnad li-Shu'ayb 11096 · sahih (authentic) our rendering
The strongest objection
All of this is quotation from the very book I am asking you to give me evidence for, and a claimed power that cannot be tested. And you have not answered my question at all. I am not asking "can He?" but "who is it that gets raised?" — if atoms are gathered and assembled, that is a copy resembling me, not me; and if my own atoms are in the body of another man, then one of us takes them and the other is made out of something else, so which of the two is the original? And "a recording Book" moves the problem from a place that can be checked to a place that cannot; it does not solve it. As for a man made to die for a hundred years, and birds on the hills, those are reports inside the disputed source itself.
The objection refutes something that was never claimed. The text does not say that your own particular atoms are recovered: "That We may transfigure you and make you what ye know not" 15; and the objectors' own wording is "a new creation" 1 — not a creation put back together out of its original matter. What holds the person together in "with Us is a recording Book" 6 is knowledge and a record of "all that befalls them in their lives and after their death" 7. So the question "which of the two bodies" assumes that what establishes a person is matter, and that is your premise, not the text's. As for "show me," that is Abraham's wording, not a demand made here 13, and the answer given him is that "each part returned to its place" after the parts had been scattered over separate hills 14 — the closest case in the whole subject to your question about dispersal. And the most honest thing to say after that: these are reports the text relates 12, not an experiment repeated in front of you today, and the text does not offer to repeat them. What is in dispute at bottom is not the truth of the report but your assumed link between the scattering of matter and the ending of the person — and that link is exactly what the report of the burned man addresses in so many words 10.
-
The children of unbelievers who died as infants — heaven or hell?
No. A child is not punished for his father's unbelief. The verse you are citing states the whole ruling in one place: "No laden soul can bear another's load, We never punish until we have sent a messenger" 1. Tafsir al-Muyassar reads it: "God punishes no one until the proof has been established against him by the sending of messengers and the sending down of books" 2. The Prophet was asked about this exact case — the children of the idolaters — and said: "God knows best what they would have been doing" 3. Ibn al-Qayyim held that this is not a withholding of judgement, but that "they are tested on the Day of Resurrection; whoever obeys enters the Garden, and whoever disobeys enters the Fire," and that the requital is for "what appears from them on the Day of Resurrection, not by His knowledge alone" 4. As for the words "They are of them," said of the children of the idolaters, its limit for him is "following them in the rulings of this world and the absence of liability, not following them in the punishment of the hereafter" 5. And assigning a child to his father's religion is lifted at the root: "Every child is born upon the natural disposition, and then his parents make him a Jew, or a Christian, or a Magian" 6 — the father attaches him to it; he is not born into it. Your second point — that preaching is therefore a harm — rests on the assumption that the Garden is a single state, entered or not entered. The text says otherwise: "And for all there will be ranks from what they do" 7, that is, "ranks with God on the Day of Resurrection, according to the deeds they did in this world" 8. Beyond that, the law forbids killing the children of the idolaters in the land of war 9 — and had dying young been a gain for them, killing them would be a kindness, not a crime.
1 Whosoever goeth right, it is only for (the good of) his own soul that he goeth right, and whosoever erreth, erreth only to its hurt. No laden soul can bear another's load, We never punish until we have sent a messenger.
Surah Al-Isra 17:15 · Open the passage
2 Whoever is guided and follows the path of truth, the reward of that returns to him alone; and whoever turns away and follows the path of falsehood, the punishment of that returns to him alone. No sinful soul bears the sin of another sinful soul. And God punishes no one until the proof has been established against him by the sending of messengers and the sending down of books.
Tafsir al-Muyassar - Al-Isra 17:15 our rendering · Open the passage
3 The Messenger of God was asked about the children of the idolaters, and he said: God knows best what they would have been doing.
Abu Hurayrah - al-Albani - Takhrij Kitab al-Sunnah 209 - hasan (good) our rendering
4 "He (peace be upon him) was asked about those who die among the children of the idolaters, and he said: God knows best what they would have been doing." This is not a withholding of judgement, as some have supposed, nor is it a statement that God will requite them for what He knows they would have done had they lived. It is a decisive answer: God knows what they would have done, and He will requite them for what He knows of them by what appears from them on the Day of Resurrection, not by His knowledge alone — as the rest of the hadiths state plainly, and as the people of hadith agree, that they are tested on the Day of Resurrection; whoever obeys enters the Garden, and whoever disobeys enters the Fire.
Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya - I'lam al-Muwaqqi'in 'an Rabb al-'Alamin, p. 208 our rendering · Open the passage
5 "He (peace be upon him) was asked about the people of a settlement of the idolaters who are raided by night, so that some of their children and women are struck, and he said: They are of them." This is a sound hadith. What he (peace be upon him) meant by their being of them is following them in the rulings of this world and the absence of liability, not following them in the punishment of the hereafter; for God, exalted be He, does not punish anyone until the proof has been established against him.
Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya - I'lam al-Muwaqqi'in 'an Rabb al-'Alamin, p. 206 our rendering · Open the passage
6 And his saying: "Every child is born upon the natural disposition, and then his parents make him a Jew, or a Christian, or a Magian, just as an animal brings forth a whole animal: do you find any mutilated among them? Abu Hurayrah said: Recite, if you wish: the natural disposition of God upon which He created people; there is no changing the creation of God [Al-Rum 30:30]."
Ibn Rajab al-Hanbali - Jami' al-'Ulum wa al-Hikam, p. 99 our rendering · Open the passage
7 And for all there will be ranks from what they do, that He may pay them for their deeds; and they will not be wronged.
Surah Al-Ahqaf 46:19 · Open the passage
8 Each group, the people of good and the people of evil, has ranks with God on the Day of Resurrection, according to the deeds they did in this world, each in keeping with his level; and so that God may pay them in full the recompense of their deeds, and they are not wronged by any increase in their evil deeds or any decrease in their good ones.
Tafsir al-Muyassar - Al-Ahqaf 46:19 our rendering · Open the passage
9 … That indicates (1) the confirmation of the prohibition against killing the children of the idolaters in the land of war (2). The Sunnah likewise indicates it (3), along with what the Book indicates: the forbidding of killing without right (4).
Al-Shafi'i (collected by al-Bayhaqi) - Ahkam al-Qur'an of al-Shafi'i, p. 266 our rendering · Open the passage
The Messenger of God was asked about the children of the idolaters, and he said: God knows best what they would have been doing.
Abu Hurayrah - al-Albani - Takhrij Kitab al-Sunnah 209 - hasan (good) our rendering
God knows best what they would have been doing [the children of the idolaters].
Narrator unnamed - Ibn Taymiyyah - al-Fatawa al-Kubra 1/79 - sahih (authentic) our rendering
The strongest objection
"God knows best what they would have been doing" is a refusal to answer, not an answer. The test in the hereafter is a patch: no verse states it, and no wording of it appears in the hadith you quoted — commentators attached it later to close a gap in the creed, and Ibn al-Qayyim himself concedes that some of your own people read the hadith as a withholding of judgement. And putting on trial a child who never sinned, in a setting where he sees the truths plainly, is not a free trial: you have not solved the problem. You moved it from this world to the next and called the move a solution.
The withholding-of-judgement reading does have holders, and Ibn al-Qayyim mentions it in order to reject it, not to hide it 4. But the ruling you asked about does not depend on which of the two readings you take: the rule is in the verse, not in the hadith — "We never punish until we have sent a messenger" 1, and its commentary, "God punishes no one until the proof has been established against him" 2. Whether by the test or by the withholding of judgement, in either case he is not punished for his father's sin. As for your assumption that the requital falls on prior knowledge of what he would have done, that is exactly what Ibn al-Qayyim denies: "not by His knowledge alone," but on "what appears from them" 4. As for how that test takes place, and whether any meaningful choice occurs in it — nothing quoted here describes it, and nothing is added beyond what is here.
-
The Quran says he could have given every soul its guidance but chose instead to fill hell — is he choosing not to guide, then punishing for going astray?
The verse runs against the reading put on it here. It is not a report about the beginning of creation. It is an answer given on the Day of Resurrection to criminals standing with their heads hanging down, who have just asked to be sent back to the world so they can do right 1 2. Abu Ja'far al-Nahhas held that the flow of the passage shows it belongs to the hereafter: "Had We willed, We would have returned them to the world and to the trial, as they asked" 4. And the word that "took effect" is not a quota someone means to reach. It is what was said to Iblis in answer to his oath that he would lead them all astray: "That I shall fill hell with thee and with such of them as follow thee, together" 5 6. That is a description of who enters, hanging on something they do themselves — following — not a fixed number to be made up. In the Quran's own idiom, the word "taking effect" means punishment falling due after refusal, not before it. On "Already hath the judgment ... proved true of most of them", al-Tafsir al-Muyassar says: "The punishment became due upon most of these disbelievers, after the truth was set before them and they refused it" 7. The commentary on the verse of al-Sajdah itself names the cause: "and that is because they chose misguidance over guidance" 3. What "And if We had so willed" rules out is compulsion, not the offering of guidance. The proof is the verse: "And if thy Lord willed, all who are in the earth would have believed together. Wouldst thou (Muhammad) compel men until they are believers?" 8
1 Couldst thou but see when the guilty hang their heads before their Lord, (and say): Our Lord! We have now seen and heard, so send us back; we will do right, now we are sure.
Surah al-Sajdah 32:12 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
2 And if We had so willed, We could have given every soul its guidance, but the word from Me concerning evildoers took effect: that I will fill hell with the jinn and mankind together.
Surah al-Sajdah 32:13 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
3 Had We willed, We would have given these who associate others with God their right guidance and the grace to believe. But the word from Me took effect and fell due: that I shall fill hell with the people of disbelief and disobedience, of jinn and mankind together; and that is because they chose misguidance over guidance.
al-Tafsir al-Muyassar, on al-Sajdah 32:13 our rendering · Open the passage
4 "And if We had so willed, We could have given every soul its guidance" — two objects. It is said that there are two views of its meaning. One of them is that the flow of the passage shows it to be in the hereafter, that is: had We willed, We would have returned them to the world and to the trial, as they asked. "But the word from Me took effect: that I shall fill hell with the jinn and mankind together", that is: the word from Me took effect that I shall punish with the punishment of hell whoever disobeyed Me. And God, mighty and majestic, knew that if He returned them they would return, as He said: "And if they were sent back they would return unto that which they are forbidden" [al-An'am: 28].
Abu Ja'far al-Nahhas, I'rab al-Qur'an, p. 200 our rendering · Open the passage
5 That I shall fill hell with thee and with such of them as follow thee, together.
Surah Sad 38:82-85 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
6 He said: Go forth from hence, degraded, banished. As for such of them as follow thee, surely I will fill hell with all of you.
Surah al-A'raf 7:18 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
7 The punishment became due upon most of these disbelievers, after the truth was set before them and they refused it. They do not believe in God or in His Messenger, and they do not act by His law.
al-Tafsir al-Muyassar, on Ya-Sin 36:7 our rendering · Open the passage
8 And if thy Lord willed, all who are in the earth would have believed together. Wouldst thou (Muhammad) compel men until they are believers?
Surah Yunus 10:99 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
9 Save him on whom thy Lord hath mercy; and for that He did create them. And the Word of thy Lord hath been fulfilled: Verily I shall fill hell with the jinn and mankind together.
Surah Hud 11:119 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
10 His wisdom, glorified and exalted, required that He create them differing: one party wretched and one party happy, and each made ready for what he was created for. By this the promise of your Lord in His judgment and His decree is fulfilled: that He, glorified be He, will fill hell with the jinn and mankind who followed Iblis and his hosts and did not find their way to faith.
al-Tafsir al-Muyassar, on Hud 11:119 our rendering · Open the passage
11 Nay, but that hath become clear unto them which before they used to hide. And if they were sent back they would return unto that which they are forbidden. Lo! they are liars.
Surah al-An'am 6:28 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
The strongest objection
This is bending the text away from its plain sense, and you undo it yourselves. In Hud, "and for that He did create them" makes the difference between them the very purpose of the creating [[9]]. Your own accepted commentary says outright that God "created them differing: one party wretched and one party happy, and each made ready for what he was created for" [[10]] — so wretchedness is a portion handed out at creation, not something earned by deeds, and your talk of "choice" is decoration over a division made beforehand. And moving the scene to the hereafter does not rescue you, it weighs on you more: these people asked to be sent back so they could do right — they asked for guidance in so many words — and they were refused, and the reason given in the context of that refusal is "the word from Me concerning evildoers took effect: that I will fill hell".
Take "each made ready for what he was created for" back to the place it was taken from, and the passage completes itself. The same commentary goes on to say that God "will fill hell with the jinn and mankind who followed Iblis and his hosts and did not find their way to faith" 10. They are identified by following and by not accepting guidance — the same identification given in Sad and in al-A'raf 5 6 — and a description tied to an act is not a lot drawn before the act. As for the refusal to send them back, the Quran explains it by a factual claim about them, not by any need to fill the fire: "And if they were sent back they would return unto that which they are forbidden. Lo! they are liars" 11. Their request is not a desire for guidance but a hope of escape at the sight of the punishment, and sending them back would change nothing. This is exactly the argument al-Nahhas made on the verse in question, joining "if He returned them" to "they would return" 4. Something in Hud does stay heavy, and it is not pushed aside here: the difference between them is explained by wisdom, and the words are "and for that He did create them" 9. That is a question about God's knowledge and decree, wider than the one asked. But it is not the claim at issue. The claim was that the fire is an end aimed at, to be filled, and that is what the wording "with thee and with such of them as follow thee" contradicts, in the two verses where the word originates 5 6.
-
'My mercy encompasses all things' — how does a mercy that encompasses everything also contain an everlasting fire?
The matter runs the other way from how it is usually put: the dilemma is manufactured by cutting the sentence in half. The phrase is one of three clauses in a single sentence — before it, "He said: I smite with My punishment whom I will," and after it, "therefore I shall ordain it for those who ward off (evil)" 1 — so the breadth, and the question of whom it is written for, are two statements said in one breath, and that is exactly what al-Suyuti read in it: "so He made clear those for whom He ordained it" 2. And "embraceth," in al-Nahhas, is a claim about capacity, not a count of who enters: "whoever enters into it, it does not fall short of him" 3. As for the two eternities, the text does not lay them down as equals: al-Zarkashi sets the wording of the two verses side by side and finds the eternity of the Fire excepted from "in wording that holds out hope," and confirmed by "Lo! thy Lord is Doer of what He will" — "meaning that there is no objection against Him in bringing the people of wretchedness out of the Fire" — while the eternity of the Garden is excepted and then the exception itself is lifted 4. The tilt is built into the construction, toward mercy and not toward the Fire. And that exception in "save for that which thy Lord willeth" 5 is named by al-Tafsir al-Muyassar: "the bringing out of the disobedient among those who profess God's oneness, after a period of their stay in the Fire" 6. The two hadiths — "My mercy has outstripped My wrath" 7 and "My mercy has overcome My wrath" 8 — say outstripping and overcoming, and their wording presupposes a wrath that is outstripped and overcome, not a wrath that does not exist. So of the two contradictories the question puts before you, the first was never asserted by the text at all: you are testing the claim "mercy reaches every single person," and the text says "mercy is not too narrow for anyone" — and a claim about capacity is not refuted by the fact that someone did not enter.
1 And ordain for us in this world that which is good, and in the Hereafter (that which is good), Lo! We have turned unto Thee. He said: I smite with My punishment whom I will, and My mercy embraceth all things, therefore I shall ordain it for those who ward off (evil) and pay the poor-due, and those who believe Our revelations;
Surah al-A'raf 7:156 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
2 And He also said in al-An'am: {Your Lord has prescribed mercy for Himself} (al-An'am: 54), and that is brief; and He expanded it here in His words: {My mercy embraceth all things, therefore I shall ordain it for those who ward off (evil)} (156) to the end of the verse — so He made clear those for whom He ordained it.
Jalal al-Din al-Suyuti, Asrar Tartib al-Qur'an (The Secrets of the Order of the Qur'an), p. 86 our rendering · Open the passage
3 "He said: I smite with My punishment whom I will" — that is, those whom I will, meaning those who deserve it. "And My mercy embraceth all things" — that is, whoever enters into it, it does not fall short of him. And it is said: it embraces every thing among created beings, so that even the beast has mercy and tenderness toward its young.
Abu Ja'far al-Nahhas, I'rab al-Qur'an (The Grammatical Analysis of the Qur'an), p. 74 our rendering · Open the passage
4 And of this is His saying, exalted be He: {As for those who are wretched, they are in the Fire; theirs therein is sighing and wailing. Abiding there so long as the heavens and the earth endure save for that which thy Lord willeth}. For when He, glorified be He, knew that the description of wretchedness covers both the disobedient believer and the unbeliever, He made an exception from the ruling of everlasting stay in the Fire in wording that holds out hope, in that He set down an unrestricted exception, and He confirmed it with His saying: {Lo! thy Lord is Doer of what He will}, meaning that there is no objection against Him in bringing the people of wretchedness out of the Fire. And when He knew that the people of felicity have no going out from the Garden, He confirmed their everlasting stay after the exception with what removes the very ground of the exception, where He said {a gift not …
Badr al-Din al-Zarkashi, al-Burhan fi 'Ulum al-Qur'an (The Proof in the Sciences of the Qur'an), p. 48 our rendering · Open the passage
5 Abiding there so long as the heavens and the earth endure save for that which thy Lord willeth. Lo! thy Lord is Doer of what He will.
Surah Hud 11:107 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
6 As for those who were wretched in this world through the corruption of their belief and the evil of their deeds, the Fire is their resting place. In it they have sighing and wailing from the severity of the torment they are in, and these are the most hideous and ugliest of sounds. They remain in the Fire forever, so long as the heavens and the earth endure; their torment is not cut off and does not come to an end, but is lasting and confirmed — except for what your Lord wills: the bringing out of the disobedient among those who profess God's oneness, after a period of their stay in the Fire. Your Lord — O Messenger — does whatever He wills.
al-Tafsir al-Muyassar (The Simplified Commentary) · Hud 11:107 our rendering · Open the passage
7 God, Mighty and Majestic, said: My mercy has outstripped My wrath.
Abu Hurayra · Muslim · Sahih Muslim 2751 · sahih (sound) our rendering
8 When God had decreed the creation, He wrote in His book, which is with Him above the Throne: My mercy has overcome My wrath.
Abu Hurayra · al-Bukhari · Sahih al-Bukhari 3194 · sahih (sound) our rendering
9 And as for those who do evil, their retreat is the Fire. Whenever they desire to issue forth from thence, they are brought back thither. Unto them it is said: Taste the torment of the Fire which ye used to deny.
Surah al-Sajda 32:20 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
10 {Remaining therein for ages}. It is said: "A huqb is eighty years. And this is not among the things that indicate an end point, as some people suppose. What indicates an end point is a fixed count: five ages, or ten. What is meant is that they remain in it for ages, and whenever one age passes, another age follows it."
Ibn Qutayba al-Dinawari, Gharib al-Qur'an (The Rare Words of the Qur'an), p. 508 our rendering · Open the passage
11 Say — O Messenger — to these idolaters: To whom belongs the dominion of the heavens and the earth and all that is in them? Say: It belongs to God, as you yourselves acknowledge and know, so worship Him alone. God has prescribed mercy for Himself, so He does not hasten punishment upon His servants.
al-Tafsir al-Muyassar (The Simplified Commentary) · al-An'am 6:12 our rendering · Open the passage
12 And what I see in those I have read and talked with — and it is a sample and not a survey, so take it for what it is worth: that the leaving happens at eternity in the fire as the wage of a sin that comes to an end, and at the verses on slavery and captives, … These are the doors, and they are not in these chapters.
Before the Three Chapters: To One Who Read and Then Left · Open the passage
God, Mighty and Majestic, said: My mercy has outstripped My wrath.
Abu Hurayra · Muslim · Sahih Muslim 2751 · sahih (sound) our rendering
When God had decreed the creation, He wrote in His book, which is with Him above the Throne: My mercy has overcome My wrath.
Abu Hurayra · al-Bukhari · Sahih al-Bukhari 3194 · sahih (sound) our rendering
The strongest objection
So you have rescued the consistency by emptying the words. A capacity that never reaches a whole class of creatures is praise, not a description; and whoever says "embraceth all things" and then means "it has room for whoever enters it" has said something that cannot be falsified, because it says nothing — and by that same measure a prison can be described as one whose guard's mercy embraces all things. And then the door you called open is bolted by your own text: "Whenever they desire to issue forth from thence, they are brought back thither."
The verse you cited stands and is not explained away 9, and the exit through "ages that come to an end" is closed by the language scholars themselves — Ibn Qutayba: "this is not among the things that indicate an end point, as some people suppose" 10 — so the answer is not "the Fire will pass away," and whoever handed you that gave you what he does not own. As for the emptying, no: the breadth does real work on those for whom it is not written — "He hath prescribed for Himself mercy," which al-Tafsir al-Muyassar explains as "so He does not hasten punishment upon His servants" 11 — so it is a mercy already running upon the one for whom it is not written, not a promise held in suspense. And what separates this from your jailer is that al-Zarkashi draws the conclusion out of the structure of the wording and not out of a charitable reading: an exception left open on the side of the Fire, and cancelled on the side of the Garden 4. And the truest thing to say after that is that your question is a heavy one and not to be brushed aside: the book counts it among the doors people actually leave through, and says its chapters do not treat it 12.
-
'Whenever their skins are burned away we replace them with fresh skins, so that they may taste the punishment' — is that justice, or engineered prolonging of pain?
The picture the objection paints is not the one in the text: there is no innocent skin here, made so that it can be burned. The verse says: "As often as their skins are consumed We shall exchange them for fresh skins that they may taste the torment" 1. That very reading was put to al-Zajjaj (d. 311 AH), and he rejected it: "If someone says: the skin that disobeyed has been replaced by a skin that did not disobey — that is a mistaken thing to say, because the one who disobeys and the one who feels the pain is the human being, not the skin" 2. And "other" in the verse, for al-Akhfash (d. 215 AH), means other in their burnt state, not other in their identity: "They are those very skins that disobeyed God, except that the burning has been removed from them" 3. So the renewal keeps the condemned person in existence; it does not invent a second victim. Tafsir al-Muyassar reads the purpose the same way, "so that their punishment and their pain may continue" 4 — the carrying out of the sentence continues, the sentence itself is not increased. As for the claim that there is no purpose here but pain, the text names the purpose: "Reward proportioned (to their evil deeds)" 5 — "a just recompense, matching the deeds they used to do in the world" 6 — and proportion is a measure that restricts; it does not set anything loose. Deterrence, for its part, belongs before the act, not after it: "We never punish until we have sent a messenger" 7. And the punishment is graded, not poured out on everyone at once: "The lightest in punishment among the people of the Fire on the Day of Resurrection is a man under the arches of whose feet are two embers" 8 — and grading makes no sense in pain that is wanted for its own sake.
1 Lo! Those who disbelieve Our revelations, We shall expose them to the Fire. As often as their skins are consumed We shall exchange them for fresh skins that they may taste the torment. Lo! Allah is ever Mighty, Wise.
Surah An-Nisa (The Women) 4:56 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
2 If someone says: the skin that disobeyed has been replaced by a skin that did not disobey — that is a mistaken thing to say, because the one who disobeys and the one who feels the pain is the human being, not the skin. It is also possible that what is replaced is the burning itself, and the skin is restored as his first skin was, as you say: I have cast from my ring another ring; you have changed the casting, but the silver is one and the same.
Abu Ishaq al-Zajjaj, Ma'ani al-Qur'an wa I'rabuh (The Meanings and Grammar of the Qur'an), p. 64 our rendering · Open the passage
3 His words, {We replaced them with other skins}, mean: other than they were in their burnt state, because God renews them, so the punishment upon them is more severe. They are those very skins that disobeyed God, except that the burning has been removed from them — as one man says to another, 'You today are other than you were yesterday,' while he is that same man, only that something has been taken from him or added to him.
Al-Akhfash al-Awsat, Ma'ani al-Qur'an (The Meanings of the Qur'an), p. 329 our rendering · Open the passage
4 Those who denied what God sent down of His signs, the revelation of His Book, His proofs and His arguments — We shall admit them into a Fire whose heat they will endure. Whenever their skins are burned away, We replace them with other skins, so that their punishment and their pain may continue. God is Mighty, nothing being beyond Him, and Wise in His ordering and His decree.
Al-Tafsir al-Muyassar (The Simplified Commentary) — An-Nisa 4:56 our rendering · Open the passage
5 Reward proportioned (to their evil deeds).
Surah An-Naba (The Tidings) 78:26 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
6 They are recompensed with that: a just recompense, matching the deeds they used to do in the world.
Al-Tafsir al-Muyassar (The Simplified Commentary) — An-Naba 78:26 our rendering · Open the passage
7 Whosoever goeth right, it is only for (the good of) his own soul that he goeth right, and whosoever erreth, erreth only to its hurt. No laden soul can bear another's load, We never punish until we have sent a messenger.
Surah Al-Isra (The Night Journey) 17:15 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
8 The lightest in punishment among the people of the Fire on the Day of Resurrection is a man under the arches of whose feet are two embers, from which his brain boils as a cauldron and a kettle boil.
Al-Nu'man ibn Bashir · al-Bukhari · Sahih al-Bukhari 6562 · sahih (authentic) our rendering
9 Then will it be said unto those who dealt unjustly Taste the torment of eternity. Are ye requited aught save what ye used to earn?
Surah Yunus (Jonah) 10:52 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
10 When God had decreed the creation, He wrote in His Book, which is with Him above the Throne: My mercy has overcome My wrath.
Abu Hurayrah · al-Bukhari · Sahih al-Bukhari 3194 · sahih (authentic) our rendering
11 And He is, together with that, Wise in what He ordains, because those who deny may ask about the punishment, how it came to be; so God made known that everything He has done is done with wisdom.
Abu Ishaq al-Zajjaj, Ma'ani al-Qur'an wa I'rabuh (The Meanings and Grammar of the Qur'an), p. 65 our rendering · Open the passage
The lightest in punishment among the people of the Fire on the Day of Resurrection is a man under the arches of whose feet are two embers, from which his brain boils as a cauldron and a kettle boil.
Al-Nu'man ibn Bashir · al-Bukhari · Sahih al-Bukhari 6562 · sahih (authentic) our rendering
When God had decreed the creation, He wrote in His Book, which is with Him above the Throne: My mercy has overcome My wrath.
Abu Hurayrah · al-Bukhari · Sahih al-Bukhari 3194 · sahih (authentic) our rendering
The strongest objection
Grading rescues nothing. On your own account the "lightest" punishment is two embers from which the brain boils [[8]] — if that is the floor, what is the ceiling? And "proportion" is a word you assert but never measure: what deed in a finite lifetime is matched by a punishment that never ends? Besides, your own source says that God renews the skins, "so the punishment upon them is more severe" [[3]] — so the increase is admitted in your words, not mine.
The first half of that is true, and nothing here softens it. The severity is in the text and cannot be denied; the phrase "more severe" is al-Akhfash's own 3, and the lightest punishment is what you have just quoted 8. But "more severe" in his words describes what the renewal does to sensation, not a sentence added on top of what is deserved — since for him the skin is the very same skin 3. As for proportion, it is not a claim without a measure: the text puts the permanence and its measure in one sentence — "Taste the torment of eternity. Are ye requited aught save what ye used to earn?" 9 — it affirms the eternity and traces it back to what was earned, not to a bare wish to inflict pain. The heaviest part of your objection is the fit between a finite life and a punishment without end, and this answer does not claim to hold a scale that settles it; what the text does say is that the scale itself leans toward mercy: "My mercy has overcome My wrath" 10. Your question is neither new nor passed over in silence: al-Zajjaj records that the verse closes with "Mighty, Wise" precisely because someone asked about the punishment, "how it came to be" 11 — and that is a referral to wisdom, not a statement of its details; whoever wants the details will not find them in this passage.
-
Wide-eyed maidens, rivers of wine, full-breasted companions — is this a spiritual paradise or a man's reward?
Yes, the description is sensory and it is not softened: "And (there are) fair ones with wide, lovely eyes" 1, "And voluptuous women of equal age" 2, "and rivers of wine delicious to the drinkers" 3. And in these passages the detail is addressed, in its very wording, to men. On "Lo! We have created them a (new) creation" the Tafsir al-Muyassar says: "We created them for the Companions of the Right" 4. But the exclusivity you build on is not in the text. At the very place of the description, the text announces that what it names is a sample and not a list: "therein is all that souls desire and eyes find sweet" 5. It then announces that the greatest part was never named at all: "No soul knoweth what is kept hid for them of joy" 6. Your claim that the prohibition is only a postponement breaks on the stated reason for the prohibition. The reason is given in the text: Satan seeks "to cast among you enmity and hatred by means of strong drink and games of chance, and to turn you from remembrance of Allah" 7. Of the drink described in the Garden, that very thing is denied: "Wherein there is no headache nor are they made mad thereby" 8. Ibn Qutaybah glossed it to mean that it does not assail their minds and carry them away 9, and al-Zajjaj glossed "nor are they made mad thereby" to mean they do not become intoxicated 10. So what was forbidden is an effect, not a name; and where the effect is gone, nothing is left but a shared word. As for "where is the woman's share", the promise is stated with her named in it: "Allah promiseth to the believers, men and women, Gardens underneath which rivers flow" 11. Her share is in the same enjoyment: "whoso doeth right, whether male or female, and is a believer, (all) such will enter the Garden, where they will be nourished without stint" 12. And your question was raised in the lifetime of the text, not centuries after it. Umm Umarah al-Ansariyyah said: "I see that everything is for the men; I do not see the women mentioned with anything", and then came down the verse naming the men who submit and the women who submit 13. And the highest thing in the Garden falls outside the sensory list altogether: "And - greater (far)! - acceptance from Allah" 11.
1 And (there are) fair ones with wide, lovely eyes,
Surah Al-Waqi'ah (The Event) 56:22 · Open the passage
2 And voluptuous women of equal age;
Surah An-Naba (The Tidings) 78:33 · Open the passage
3 A similitude of the Garden which those who keep their duty (to Allah) are promised: Therein are rivers of water unpolluted, and rivers of milk whereof the flavour changeth not, and rivers of wine delicious to the drinkers, and rivers of clear-run honey; therein for them is every kind of fruit, with pardon from their Lord. (Are those who enjoy all this) like those who are immortal in the Fire and are given boiling water to drink so that it teareth their bowels?
Surah Muhammad 47:15 · Open the passage
4 We brought the women of the people of Paradise into being in a creation other than the creation that was theirs in this world, a complete creation that admits no passing away. We made them virgins, endeared to their husbands, all of one age. We created them for the Companions of the Right.
Al-Tafsir al-Muyassar on Surah Al-Waqi'ah (The Event) 56:35 our rendering · Open the passage
5 Therein are brought round for them trays of gold and goblets, and therein is all that souls desire and eyes find sweet. And ye are immortal therein.
Surah Az-Zukhruf (Ornaments of Gold) 43:71 · Open the passage
6 No soul knoweth what is kept hid for them of joy, as a reward for what they used to do.
Surah As-Sajdah (The Prostration) 32:17 · Open the passage
7 Satan seeketh only to cast among you enmity and hatred by means of strong drink and games of chance, and to turn you from remembrance of Allah and from (His) worship. Will ye then have done?
Surah Al-Ma'idah (The Table Spread) 5:91 · Open the passage
8 Wherein there is no headache nor are they made mad thereby.
Surah As-Saffat (Those Who Set The Ranks) 37:47 · Open the passage
9 {Therein is no ghawl}: that is, it does not assail their minds and carry them away. It is said: "Wine is a ghawl of forbearance, and war is a ghawl of souls." And one says: ghalani ghawlan. And al-ghawl also means distance.
Ibn Qutaybah al-Dinawari, Gharib al-Qur'an, p. 368 our rendering · Open the passage
10 (nor are they made mad thereby): they do not become intoxicated. Al-nazif is the drunkard; he is called nazif and manzuf only because his mind has been drained away.
Al-Zajjaj, Ma'ani al-Qur'an wa-I'rabuh, p. 109 our rendering · Open the passage
11 Allah promiseth to the believers, men and women, Gardens underneath which rivers flow, wherein they will abide - blessed dwellings in Gardens of Eden. And - greater (far)! - acceptance from Allah. That is the supreme triumph.
Surah At-Tawbah (Repentance) 9:72 · Open the passage
12 Whoso doeth an ill-deed, he will be repaid the like thereof, while whoso doeth right, whether male or female, and is a believer, (all) such will enter the Garden, where they will be nourished without stint.
Surah Ghafir (The Forgiver) 40:40 · Open the passage
13 (K) Al-Tirmidhi reported it, and graded it hasan, by way of Ikrimah, from Umm Umarah al-Ansariyyah, that she came to the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, and said: I see that everything is for the men; I do not see the women mentioned with anything. Then there came down the verse naming the men who submit and the women who submit.
Al-Suyuti, Lubab al-Nuqul fi Asbab al-Nuzul, p. 173 our rendering · Open the passage
14 ... Umm Salamah said: Messenger of Allah, I do not hear Allah mention the women in the emigration with anything. So Allah, exalted be He, sent down: "And their Lord hath heard them (and He saith): Lo! I suffer not the work of any worker, male or female, to be lost", to the end of the verse. Al-Hakim Abu Abdullah related it in his Sahih ...
Al-Wahidi, Asbab Nuzul al-Qur'an, p. 138 our rendering · Open the passage
15 So Allah answered their supplication: He does not let the effort of any of them who does a righteous deed go to waste, male or female; and they are equal in the brotherhood of religion, in the acceptance of deeds, and in the reward for them ...
Al-Tafsir al-Muyassar on Surah Al Imran (The Family of Imran) 3:195 our rendering · Open the passage
The strongest objection
Everything you have brought is an expansion offered after the narrowing has already done its work. When the text gave detail, it gave detail for one side: wide-eyed maidens, full-breasted companions, and women created "for the Companions of the Right". And when the woman's turn came, it went no further than the general: she enters the Garden, she is not wronged, she is provided for. The general includes; it does not describe. Whoever gives detail for one class and speaks in summary of another has disclosed whom he was addressing. Your appeal to "all that souls desire" is a door opened after it had been shut. Then, that "acceptance from Allah" is the greater thing is a line every religion says about itself. So what is particular to this text, and what marks it out, is the detail alone, and the detail is for a man.
Your first half is granted, and no twisting will push it away: the sensory detail is on the side of the men, and the commentary itself says so without evasion, "We created them for the Companions of the Right" 4. Your second half breaks at the assumption that the text was never confronted with this. It was. Umm Salamah said: "I do not hear Allah mention the women in the emigration with anything", and there came down: "Lo! I suffer not the work of any worker, male or female, to be lost" 14. Now look at what came as the answer. No matching sensory list was produced. The scale was levelled instead: "they are equal in the brotherhood of religion, in the acceptance of deeds, and in the reward for them" 15. Whoever reads that as an objection to the language of detail is right, and may object as much as he wishes. Whoever reads it as a shortfall in the apportionment has confused the language with the apportionment. The apportionment is stated as "without stint" for male and female alike 12, and the description you argue from declares its own incompleteness in its own words, "what is kept hid for them of joy" 6.
-
Why is one child born into famine and war and another into wealth and safety — and then both judged on one scale?
The matter is not as it was described: the scale is not one scale, and the text says so in its own words, with no reading imposed on it — "Allah asketh naught of any soul save that which He hath given it" 1. The commentary on that verse: "the poor man is not charged with the like of what the rich man is charged with" 2; and it is the saying of al-Suddi as al-Nahhas records it: "God does not charge the poor man with the spending of the rich" 3. Nor does accountability begin where you were born. It begins where the case has reached you: "We never punish until we have sent a messenger" 4 — "God punishes no one until the proof has been established against him by the sending of messengers and the sending down of books" 5. As for the idea that a house of means is a mark of favour and a house of hardship a mark of anger, the text strikes down both with a single word: the man whom his Lord tries by honouring him says "My Lord honoureth me"; the man whose provision is straitened says that his Lord has humiliated him; and to both the answer is "Nay" 6 — "It is not as this man supposes. Rather, honour lies in obedience to God, and humiliation in disobedience to Him" 7. What is weighed is not the circumstances you were placed in: "God does not look at your forms or your wealth, but He looks at your hearts and your deeds" 8. So your sentence — "an examination whose questions differ is not one examination" — is correct. And they do not claim that it is one; they claim that the question is measured against what the one questioned was given 1.
1 Let him who hath abundance spend of his abundance, and he whose provision is measured, let him spend of that which Allah hath given him. Allah asketh naught of any soul save that which He hath given it. Allah will vouchsafe, after hardship, ease.
Surah al-Talaq (Divorce) 65:7 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
2 …and whoever has been straitened in his provision — that is, the poor man — let him spend of what God has given him of provision. The poor man is not charged with the like of what the rich man is charged with. God will grant, after straitness and hardship, ease and sufficiency.
al-Tafsir al-Muyassar · Surah al-Talaq (Divorce) 65:7 our rendering · Open the passage
3 "Allah asketh naught of any soul save that which He hath given it" — al-Suddi said: God does not charge the poor man with the spending of the rich. And Ibn Zayd said: the poor man is not charged with paying the alms-tax or giving in charity.
Abu Ja'far al-Nahhas · I'rab al-Qur'an, p. 298 our rendering · Open the passage
4 Whosoever goeth right, it is only for (the good of) his own soul that he goeth right, and whosoever erreth, erreth only to its hurt. No laden soul can bear another's load, We never punish until we have sent a messenger.
Surah al-Isra' (The Night Journey) 17:15 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
5 Whoever is guided and follows the path of truth, the reward of that returns to him alone; and whoever turns away and follows the path of falsehood, the punishment of that returns to him alone. No sinning soul bears the sin of another sinning soul. And God punishes no one until the proof has been established against him by the sending of messengers and the sending down of books.
al-Tafsir al-Muyassar · Surah al-Isra' (The Night Journey) 17:15 our rendering · Open the passage
6 As for man, whenever his Lord trieth him by honouring him, and is gracious unto him, he saith: My Lord honoureth me.
Surah al-Fajr (The Dawn) 89:15–17 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
7 It is not as this man supposes. Rather, honour lies in obedience to God, and humiliation in disobedience to Him; and you do not honour the orphan, nor treat him well…
al-Tafsir al-Muyassar · Surah al-Fajr (The Dawn) 89:17 our rendering · Open the passage
8 God does not look at your forms or your wealth, but He looks at your hearts and your deeds.
Abu Hurayrah · Muslim · Sahih Muslim 2564 · sahih (authentic) our rendering
9 The most severely tried of people are the prophets, then those nearest to them, then the next. A man is tried according to his religion: if he is firm in his religion his trial is made severe, and if there is softness in his religion he is tried according to his religion. Trial does not leave the servant until it leaves him walking on the earth with no sin upon him.
Sa'd ibn Abi Waqqas · Shu'ayb al-Arna'ut · Takhrij Siyar A'lam al-Nubala' 9/160 · sahih (authentic) our rendering
10 "We never punish until we have sent a messenger" — on this there are two views. One is that the meaning is: We were not punishing with the punishment that comes as a penalty for going against something that can be known only by being informed of it, until We send a messenger. The other is that what is meant is the punishment of utter destruction.
Abu Ja'far al-Nahhas · I'rab al-Qur'an, p. 267 our rendering · Open the passage
11 And here is the crux of the matter: the objection is entirely sound against a man who has never examined anything at all. And whoever inherited the belief and never put a single question to it is, in this, in the same case as the man who inherited its contrary and never put a question to it. And that takes in most of us, not most of them — and I say it without dressing it up: many of the religious have not examined, and many of those who have left have not examined, and the two parties throw at each other a single charge that is true of them both.
Chapter 16, "If I Had Been Born in India" · Open the passage
12 As for your own question, my answer to it is one: why this particular measure? Why this particular child? I do not know. And I know of no one who knows. And everyone who has told you otherwise either did not understand your question, or judged his own silence to weigh on him more heavily than words he does not possess.
Chapter 12, "The Heaviest Question in the Matter" · Open the passage
God does not look at your forms or your wealth, but He looks at your hearts and your deeds.
Abu Hurayrah · Muslim · Sahih Muslim 2564 · sahih (authentic) our rendering
The most severely tried of people are the prophets, then those nearest to them, then the next. A man is tried according to his religion: if he is firm in his religion his trial is made severe, and if there is softness in his religion he is tried according to his religion. Trial does not leave the servant until it leaves him walking on the earth with no sin upon him.
Sa'd ibn Abi Waqqas · Shu'ayb al-Arna'ut · Takhrij Siyar A'lam al-Nubala' 9/160 · sahih (authentic) our rendering
The strongest objection
All of this is a claim made inside the system, testifying on its own behalf. That the text says "obligation is in proportion to what is given" does not establish that the adjustment actually happens; it only promises that it does. And I have no way to inspect a scale I cannot see and am told about only by the accused party. Besides, you have answered the reckoning and left the root of the disparity untouched: why this particular child in the famine? A promise that things will be evened out after death does not explain why the difference happened before it.
Your last part is granted to you without haggling, and from the book itself: "why this particular measure? Why this particular child? I do not know. And I know of no one who knows." 12. And your first part — the house of prayer and the house of drink — is granted too, in its place: "the objection is entirely sound against a man who has never examined anything at all… And that takes in most of us, not most of them" 11. But your claim was narrower than this and more exact: you said "one scale" — and that is the only thing that has fallen, not to a counter-argument but to the fact that the text does not say it, and to the fact that the disagreement over the very first condition of accountability is written down in their own books from the fourth Islamic century onward: on "We never punish until we have sent a messenger" al-Nahhas reports "two views" and then sets both of them out 10. And it remains true that the adjustment having taken place is a report and not something observed, so confidence in it rests on confidence in the one who reports it, not on itself — and that is a question put to the reporter, not to the scale, and it is not answered here. One more thing is mentioned because it overturns the silent premise in your question, that ease is an advantage in the examination: "The most severely tried of people are the prophets, then those nearest to them, then the next; a man is tried according to his religion" 9.
-
A murderer repents a minute before death and enters paradise, while his non-believing victim burns for ever — is that justice?
The case is the exact opposite of what the question describes. The last-minute word is precisely the word the text refuses: "The forgiveness is not for those who do ill-deeds until, when death attendeth upon one of them, he saith: Lo! I repent now" 1 — that is, whoever persists in sin and does not return to his Lord "until the death agonies come upon them" 2. And what is accepted is bound by "then turn quickly (in repentance) to Allah" 5 — a window with a life left to live after it, not a sentence spoken at the end. The Qur'an gives the most famous case of exactly this: Pharaoh pronounced the full declaration of God's oneness while he was drowning 3, and the answer came back to him: "Repentance is of no use to you at the hour of the death agony, when you see death and the punishment" 4 — so the system you describe as rewarding good timing is the very one that voids timed repentance in the plainest possible terms. Nor does repentance swallow the victim's right, in this world or the next: a killer's remorse and repentance before he is caught do not lift retribution from him, unlike the brigand 6; and in the hereafter, "no one of the people of Paradise shall enter Paradise while anyone of the people of the Fire holds a claim of wrong against him, even a slap", and that claim is settled "out of good deeds and bad deeds" 7 — which is your own picture exactly: a killer in Paradise, a murdered man in the Fire, and the debt still collected. As for the other half of it — someone who lived justly and never pronounced the words — punishment does not follow merely from not pronouncing them: "We never punish until we have sent a messenger" 8; "God punishes no one until the proof has been established against him by the sending of messengers and the sending down of books" 9.
1 The forgiveness is not for those who do ill-deeds until, when death attendeth upon one of them, he saith: Lo! I repent now; nor yet for those who die while they are disbelievers. For such We have prepared a painful doom.
Surah An-Nisa (Women) 4:18 · Open the passage
2 Repentance is not accepted from those who persist in committing sins and do not return to their Lord until the death agonies come upon them, and then one of them says: I repent now. Nor is repentance accepted from those who die denying and rejecting the oneness of God and the message of His Messenger Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace. For those who persisted in sin until they died, and the deniers who die as disbelievers, We have prepared a painful punishment.
Al-Tafsir al-Muyassar - An-Nisa 4:18 our rendering · Open the passage
3 And We brought the Children of Israel across the sea, and Pharaoh with his hosts pursued them in rebellion and transgression, till, when the (fate of) drowning overtook him, he exclaimed: I believe that there is no Allah save Him in Whom the Children of Israel believe, and I am of those who surrender (unto Him).
Surah Yunus (Jonah) 10:90 · Open the passage
4 Now, Pharaoh? Now that death has come down upon you, you confess your servitude to God, when you disobeyed Him before His punishment came down upon you, and you were one of the corrupters who turned people away from His path! Repentance is of no use to you at the hour of the death agony, when you see death and the punishment.
Al-Tafsir al-Muyassar - Yunus 10:91 our rendering · Open the passage
5 Forgiveness is only incumbent on Allah toward those who do evil in ignorance (and) then turn quickly (in repentance) to Allah. These are they toward whom Allah relenteth. Allah is ever Knower, Wise.
Surah An-Nisa (Women) 4:17 · Open the passage
6 ... and He did not give weight to the killer's repentance and remorse before he is caught, while He did give weight to the brigand's repentance before he is caught ...
Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya - I'lam al-Muwaqqi'in 'an Rabb al-'Alamin, p. 39 our rendering · Open the passage
7 ... I am the Owner, I am the Judge. No one of the people of Paradise shall enter Paradise while anyone of the people of the Fire holds a claim of wrong against him, even a slap; and no one of the people of the Fire shall enter the Fire while anyone of the people of Paradise holds a claim of wrong against him, even a slap ... He said: We said to him: How, when we come to God barefoot, naked and uncircumcised? He said: "Out of good deeds and bad deeds."
Ibn Abd al-Barr - Jami' Bayan al-'Ilm wa-Fadlih, p. 677 our rendering · Open the passage
8 Whosoever goeth right, it is only for (the good of) his own soul that he goeth right, and whosoever erreth, erreth only to its hurt. No laden soul can bear another's load, We never punish until we have sent a messenger.
Surah al-Isra (The Night Journey) 17:15 · Open the passage
9 Whoever is guided and follows the path of truth, the reward of that returns to him alone; and whoever turns aside and follows the path of falsehood, the punishment of that returns to him alone. No sinful soul bears the sin of another sinful soul. And God punishes no one until the proof has been established against him by the sending of messengers and the sending down of books.
Al-Tafsir al-Muyassar - al-Isra 17:15 our rendering · Open the passage
10 Rights are of two kinds: the right of God and the right of a human being. The right of God admits no compromise settlement, such as the prescribed penalties, the alms, the expiations and the like; the settlement between a servant and his Lord lies in carrying them out, not in neglecting them ... As for the rights of human beings, these are the ones that admit settlement, waiver, and compensation.
Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya - I'lam al-Muwaqqi'in 'an Rabb al-'Alamin, p. 84 our rendering · Open the passage
11 And slay not the life which Allah hath forbidden save with right. Whoso is slain wrongfully, We have given power unto his heir, but let him not commit excess in slaying. Lo! he will be helped.
Surah al-Isra (The Night Journey) 17:33 · Open the passage
12 Whoso slayeth a believer of set purpose, his reward is hell for ever. Allah is wroth against him and He hath cursed him and prepared for him an awful doom.
Surah An-Nisa (Women) 4:93 · Open the passage
13 It has been related from Ibn Abbas what indicates that he intended severity by this statement. ... that Ibn Abbas, may God be pleased with him, used to say: there is repentance for one who has killed a believer. Then a man came to him and asked: is there repentance for one who has killed a believer? He said: No, nothing but the Fire. When the man had left, those sitting with him said: This is not how you used to answer us; you used to tell us that one who kills a believer deliberately has a repentance that is accepted, so what is the matter today? He said: I think he is a man in a rage who wants to kill a believer. So they sent someone after him and found him to be just that.
Ibn al-Jawzi - Nawasikh al-Qur'an, p. 388 our rendering · Open the passage
The strongest objection
That moves the deadline; it does not answer the objection. You have ruled out the last minute and kept the decades. A killer who repents at forty and dies pious at eighty enters Paradise, and the murdered man is exactly where you left him. And then you have your Lord cancelling a debt that is not owed to Him: the blood is the victim's blood, not God's, so on what ground does anyone forgive it except the one to whom it belongs?
A debt that is not owed to God is not God's to cancel, and the division is stated outright, not inferred: "the right of God admits no compromise settlement — such as the prescribed penalties, the alms, the expiations and the like", while "as for the rights of human beings, these are the ones that admit settlement, waiver, and compensation" 10 — that is, such a right lies in the hand of its owner alone, and this is exactly the distinction you are asking for. That is why retribution stands even alongside repentance and remorse 6, why the right is placed with the heir of the slain, "Whoso is slain wrongfully, We have given power unto his heir" 11, and why the wrong is still collected out of the killer's good deeds on the Day of Resurrection, down to a slap 7 — his entry is not free, and the file is not closed. And the harder part should not be hidden, because it presses against you rather than for you: the penalty for killing a believer deliberately is "his reward is hell for ever" 12; and Ibn Abbas once told a questioner that such a man has no repentance, "nothing but the Fire", and it then emerged that he had been severe with him only because he took him for "a man in a rage who wants to kill a believer", while he used to give the opposite ruling 13. So the dispute in the tradition was over narrowing repentance for a killer, not widening it — which weighs on the question from the other side: the severity reaches a point people argued against, not that mercy is left loose.
-
If I were given a second chance after seeing the truth with my own eyes I would believe — so why is none given?
No — you are not judged for a hypothetical act. The basis of requital is stated in another verse, with no supposition in it at all: "This day no soul is wronged in aught; nor are ye requited aught save what ye used to do." 6 And the verse "And if they were sent back they would return unto that which they are forbidden." 2 does not impose a penalty; it answers a claim its own subjects had just made in the verse before it: "Oh, would that we might return! Then would we not deny the revelations of our Lord" 1 — so what is being refused is something they said, not a sentence newly passed upon them. Your objection, in almost its very wording, is raised in a book by a man who died in 215 AH — "how were they liars when they had not yet returned?" — and the answer given there is that the lying being judged is what actually came from them, not what is supposed: "that is, the lying and unbelief they came to the Day of Resurrection with" 4. The supposition itself is drawn from something that happened, not from bare unseen knowledge: "because they disbelieved after the proof had become binding upon them" 5. And just before that the verse describes them as those of whom "that hath become clear unto them which before they used to hide" 2 — that is, "what they knew in themselves of the truth of what the messengers brought in this world, even while they showed their followers the opposite of it" 3. So what is held against them is a concealment that took place, not an intention guessed at. As for the second chance, the Qur'an answers that request with something other than what you expect. "Our Lord! Release us; we will do right" is met with "Did not We grant you a life long enough for him who reflected to reflect therein? And the warner came unto you." 7 — "did We not give you, in this life, a sufficient measure of years" 8 — so the answer points back to a chance already spent; it does not argue from a chance still to come.
1 If thou couldst see when they are set before the Fire and say: Oh, would that we might return! Then would we not deny the revelations of our Lord but we would be of the believers!
Surah al-An'am (The Cattle) 6:27 · Open the passage
2 Nay, but that hath become clear unto them which before they used to hide. And if they were sent back they would return unto that which they are forbidden. Lo! they are liars.
Surah al-An'am (The Cattle) 6:28 · Open the passage
3 It is not so. Rather, there became clear to them on the Day of Resurrection what they had known in themselves of the truth of what the messengers brought in this world, even while they showed their followers the opposite of it. And were it supposed that they were returned to this world and granted respite, they would go back to their obstinacy in unbelief and denial. And they are liars in their saying: were we returned to this world we would not deny the signs of our Lord, and we would be of the believers.
Al-Tafsir al-Muyassar - Surah al-An'am 6:28 our rendering · Open the passage
4 And in the Book of God, Mighty and Majestic: {And if they were sent back they would return unto that which they are forbidden. Lo! they are liars.} A questioner asks and says: how were they liars when they had not yet returned? [And] they would only be liars once they returned. ... Or one says: {Lo! they are liars} means the lying and unbelief they came to the Day of Resurrection with, for those who entered the Fire were liars and unbelievers.
Al-Akhfash al-Awsat (d. 215 AH) - Ma'ani al-Qur'an, p. 329 our rendering · Open the passage
5 Because this saying of theirs comes after they have been raised, have learned the matter of the Resurrection, and have seen the Fire with their own eyes. The meaning is that most of those among the Jews and the idolaters who saw plainly had already known that the command of God is true, yet inclined to ease and to the thought that the matter was still deferred for a term, as Iblis did, who had witnessed of God's proofs what nothing surpasses. So God, Mighty and Majestic, made it known that were they sent back they would return, because they disbelieved after the proof had become binding upon them.
Abu Ishaq al-Zajjaj (d. 311 AH) - Ma'ani al-Qur'an wa-I'rabuh, p. 239 our rendering · Open the passage
6 This day no soul is wronged in aught; nor are ye requited aught save what ye used to do.
Surah Ya-Sin 36:54 · Open the passage
7 And they cry for help there, (saying): Our Lord! Release us; we will do right, not (the wrong) that we used to do. Did not We grant you a life long enough for him who reflected to reflect therein? And the warner came unto you. Now taste (the flavour of your deeds), for evil-doers have no helper.
Surah Fatir (The Originator) 35:37 · Open the passage
8 These unbelievers cry out from the severity of the punishment in the Fire of Hell, calling for help: Our Lord, bring us out of the Fire of Hell and return us to the world, that we may do righteous work other than what we used to do in our worldly life, believing instead of disbelieving. So He says to them: did We not give you, in this life, a sufficient measure of years, in which whoever would take heed could take heed, and the Prophet, God bless him and grant him peace, came to you - and even so you did not remember and did not take heed? ...
Al-Tafsir al-Muyassar - Surah Fatir 35:37 our rendering · Open the passage
9 And His saying: (And if they were sent back they would return unto that which they are forbidden) ... And this shows that they are moulded upon evil, habituated to contravening what is forbidden and what is commanded.
Abu Bakr al-Baqillani (d. 403 AH) - I'jaz al-Qur'an, p. 96 our rendering · Open the passage
10 And notice the restriction in the third premise: 'non-resistant'. So whoever answers the argument with 'the evidence is plain and the denier is being obstinate' has not addressed it at all — he has addressed a different argument.
12. The Heaviest Question in the Chapter — §5 Divine Hiddenness · Open the passage
The strongest objection
All of this rests on the claim that the one addressed hid what he knew. I have hidden nothing, and no proof I am aware of has been established against me, and the verse generalizes without making an exception. And one of your own early scholars read it worse than you have just read it: al-Baqillani said in I'jaz al-Qur'an that it shows they were "moulded upon evil" — a nature built into them, and then they are punished for it. That is uglier than passing judgment on an intention.
The reading you cite does stand in the tradition, and there is no hiding it 9. Set against it, in that same tradition, is the referring of the matter back to an act that occurred: unbelief after the proof had become binding, not a disposition fixed beforehand 5. As for the generalization, the context restricts it: the people the verse is about are described as having "used to hide" what they knew of themselves 2, and this is explained as their "showing their followers the opposite of it" 3 — that is the description of a man concealing, not of a man in doubt. As for your saying that you hid nothing, that is a real distinction, and no trick disposes of it; the book states it against its own side rather than in its favour: whoever answers the argument from hiddenness with 'the evidence is plain and the denier is being obstinate' has not addressed it at all 10. So the verse does not reach you. And your question — why do I not see? — is a different question with a weight of its own, and it cannot rightly be answered with a verse about people who hid what they knew.
-
What restores what was taken from someone tortured to death? Is punishing the perpetrator enough?
Yes: Paradise is compensation, not justification. That is settled here in as many words — "whoever offers compensation as an answer to the question of justification has changed the question" 5. But the second half of your question does not land on what the text actually says, because the first thing that happens is not the handing over of a garden. The question is put to the murdered girl herself: "And when the girl-child that was buried alive is asked" 1 — asked for what sin she was killed. Al-Tafsir al-Muyassar calls it "a question to console her and to rebuke the one who buried her" 2: she is a witness given her due, not a closed file, and the crime is named in her own voice, to her killer's face. Then the payment comes out of the perpetrator's account and into the victim's, not out of some third treasury: the wronged party is given from the good deeds of the one who wronged them, and if his good deeds run out before what he owes is settled, the sins of the wronged party are taken and cast upon him 3. And no pardon is issued over the head of the one who holds the claim: whoever has wronged another is ordered to obtain release from that person himself, before a day in which there is neither dinar nor dirham 4 — that is, the one who can clear the account is the claimant, not a third party buying her silence. What none of this provides is a reason that makes the torture itself acceptable, and no such claim is made: the answer to "will it be left without redress?" is not the answer to "why did the pain happen" 6.
1 And when the girl-child that was buried alive is asked
Surah al-Takwir (The Overthrowing) 81:8-9 · Open the passage
2 And when the infant girl buried alive is asked on the Day of Resurrection — a question to console her and to rebuke the one who buried her: for what sin was she buried?
Al-Tafsir al-Muyassar · Surah al-Takwir (The Overthrowing) 81:8-9 our rendering · Open the passage
3 Do you know who the bankrupt is? They said: The bankrupt among us is one who has no coin and no goods. He said: The bankrupt of my nation is one who comes on the Day of Resurrection with prayer, and fasting, and alms, and comes having insulted this one, and slandered that one, and consumed the wealth of this one, and shed the blood of that one, and struck this one. So this one is given from his good deeds, and that one from his good deeds; and if his good deeds run out before what he owes is settled, their sins are taken and cast upon him, then he is cast into the Fire.
Abu Hurayra · Muslim · Sahih Muslim 2581 · Sahih (authentic) our rendering
4 Whoever has done his brother a wrong, let him obtain release from him for it, for there is neither dinar nor dirham there, before it is taken for his brother from his good deeds; and if he has no good deeds, his brother's bad deeds are taken and cast upon him.
Abu Hurayra · al-Bukhari · Sahih al-Bukhari 6534 · Sahih (authentic) our rendering
5 redress after death is compensation, not justification. And it is exactly what Adams drew attention to: that the afflicted be made whole after his affliction is one thing, and that there be in the affliction itself a good justifying the permission of it is quite another. And whoever offers compensation as an answer to the question of justification has changed the question.
12. The heaviest question in the field · Open the passage
6 Then too, it does not answer 'why did the pain happen' at all; it answers a different question: will it be left without redress? And the difference between the two questions is everything — and whoever runs them together has promised what he does not deliver.
12. The heaviest question in the field · Open the passage
Do you know who the bankrupt is? They said: The bankrupt among us is one who has no coin and no goods. He said: The bankrupt of my nation is one who comes on the Day of Resurrection with prayer, and fasting, and alms, and comes having insulted this one, and slandered that one, and consumed the wealth of this one, and shed the blood of that one, and struck this one. So this one is given from his good deeds, and that one from his good deeds; and if his good deeds run out before what he owes is settled, their sins are taken and cast upon him, then he is cast into the Fire.
Abu Hurayra · Muslim · Sahih Muslim 2581 · Sahih (authentic) our rendering
Whoever has done his brother a wrong, let him obtain release from him for it, for there is neither dinar nor dirham there, before it is taken for his brother from his good deeds; and if he has no good deeds, his brother's bad deeds are taken and cast upon him.
Abu Hurayra · al-Bukhari · Sahih al-Bukhari 6534 · Sahih (authentic) our rendering
The strongest objection
All of this is bookkeeping in the perpetrator's ledger, and none of it comes back to her. Her killer's good deeds are not the life that was taken from her, and asking her for what sin she was killed rebukes him; it returns nothing to her. You have moved a balance from one column to another and called the transfer justice. And the one conducting the reckoning is the one who was able to stop the torture and did not — and a court whose judge has the power to halt the crime before it happens is not acquitted by dividing the accounts neatly afterwards.
The first half is granted, and it is not contested: nothing here claims that what happened was undone or cancelled. What is said is that the ledger was not closed, not that the wound never happened 6. But "moving a balance" is a description that does not describe. The difference between a debt collected and a silence bought is that the one collecting is the holder of the claim; that what is collected comes out of the very substance of what the perpetrator has, and is not a payment created for her in order to quiet her 3; and that the waiver is in her hand 4 — a buyer of silence meets none of the three. As for the second half, it is that other question exactly, and it is stated outright here that this answer does not touch it 5, and that whoever runs the two questions together "has promised what he does not deliver" 6 — so nothing will be added here beyond what there is warrant for.
-
If the scale is exact and wrongs no one by an atom's weight, what is intercession for?
The matter is not what is usually assumed. There are not two parties contending over the verdict: intercession itself belongs to the Judge and to no one else — "Say: Unto Allah belongeth all intercession. His is the Sovereignty of the heavens and the earth." 1 "The whole matter belongs to Allah alone, and none may intercede with Him except by His leave" 2. Its condition is stated in the text, not inferred from it: "On that day no intercession availeth save (that of) him unto whom the Beneficent hath given leave and whose word He accepteth." 3 — leave for the intercessor, and approval of the one interceded for that comes before the intercession. Whoever does not meet that: "The mediation of no mediators will avail them then." 4 The picture you describe — influence through lineage and standing — is exactly what the Qur'an came to demolish: "They used to say that they were the sons of the prophets and the sons of their sons, and that our fathers will intercede for us; so Allah informed them that intercession will not avail them, and that no soul will pay anything on behalf of another" 5. And the claim made for the scale is not a bare piece of arithmetic that a surplus would break. It is the denial of short-changing: "no soul is wronged in aught" 6. In the very verse that rules out wrong by an atom's weight, bounty is announced in the second half: "Lo! Allah wrongeth not even of the weight of an ant; and if there is a good deed, He will double it." 7 As for bargaining and friendship — the machinery of favouritism — the text denies them alongside intercession in one place: a day "when there will be no trafficking, nor friendship, nor intercession." 8
1 Say: Unto Allah belongeth all intercession. His is the Sovereignty of the heavens and the earth. And afterward unto Him ye will be brought back.
Surah Az-Zumar (The Troops) 39:44 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
2 Say, O Messenger, to these idolaters: to Allah belongs all intercession; His is the sovereignty of the heavens and the earth and all that is in them. The whole matter belongs to Allah alone, and none may intercede with Him except by His leave, … so intercession must be sought from the One who owns it, and worship must be devoted to Him alone.
Al-Tafsir al-Muyassar (The Simplified Exegesis) · Surah Az-Zumar (The Troops) 39:44 our rendering · Open the passage
3 On that day no intercession availeth save (that of) him unto whom the Beneficent hath given leave and whose word He accepteth.
Surah Ta Ha 20:109 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
4 The mediation of no mediators will avail them then.
Surah Al-Muddaththir (The Cloaked One) 74:48 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
5 Both of these verses concern the Children of Israel. They used to say that they were the sons of the prophets and the sons of their sons, and that our fathers will intercede for us; so Allah informed them that intercession will not avail them, and that no soul will pay anything on behalf of another.
Badr al-Din al-Zarkashi · Al-Burhan fi Ulum al-Qur'an (The Proof in the Sciences of the Qur'an), p. 123 our rendering · Open the passage
6 And We set a just balance for the Day of Resurrection so that no soul is wronged in aught. Though it be of the weight of a grain of mustard seed, We bring it. And We suffice for reckoners.
Surah Al-Anbiya (The Prophets) 21:47 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
7 Lo! Allah wrongeth not even of the weight of an ant; and if there is a good deed, He will double it and will give (the doer) from His presence an immense reward.
Surah An-Nisa (Women) 4:40 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
8 O ye who believe! spend of that wherewith We have provided you ere a day come when there will be no trafficking, nor friendship, nor intercession. The disbelievers, they are the wrong-doers.
Surah Al-Baqarah (The Cow) 2:254 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
9 And that no one will attain an atom of good or more except by His bounty and His mercy, nor an atom of evil or more except by His justice and His wisdom.
Jalal al-Din al-Suyuti · Al-Itqan fi Ulum al-Qur'an (The Perfection in the Sciences of the Qur'an), p. 93 our rendering · Open the passage
10 He says: he is not wronged by being made to bear another's sin. And the words that deny deprivation mean that nothing is cut away from him, so that his good deeds are diminished. One says hadamahu and ihtadamahu when he deprives a man of his due.
Muhammad ibn Uzayr al-Sijistani · Gharib al-Qur'an, known as Nuzhat al-Qulub (The Rare Words of the Qur'an, known as The Delight of Hearts), p. 492 our rendering · Open the passage
11 Lo! Allah forgiveth not that a partner should be ascribed unto Him. He forgiveth (all) save that to whom He will. Whoso ascribeth partners to Allah, he hath indeed invented a tremendous sin.
Surah An-Nisa (Women) 4:48 — Marmaduke Pickthall, The Meaning of the Glorious Koran (1930) · Open the passage
The strongest objection
This empties intercession rather than establishing it. If approval of the one interceded for comes first, the man is already saved by the verdict, and intercession is an honour for the intercessor with no effect on the outcome — so why mention it at all? And if it does have an effect, then a verdict already passed has been changed, and we are back to the favouritism you set out to escape. Then there is "to whom He will": a will with no declared rule governing it, and calling it mercy does not make it a rule.
The effect is real, but it works on a different axis from the scale. Punishment is governed by justice and giving by bounty, and the two do not compete for the same ground — "no one will attain an atom of good or more except by His bounty and His mercy, nor an atom of evil or more except by His justice and His wisdom" 9. Wrong, in the language of the text, is subtraction and not surplus: "he is not wronged by being made to bear another's sin. And the words that deny deprivation mean that nothing is cut away from him, so that his good deeds are diminished. One says hadamahu and ihtadamahu when he deprives a man of his due" 10. So the scale guards a floor: that no one is short-changed of his right and no one is made to carry another's burden. And whoever is given above his due, that was taken from no one — "no soul is wronged in aught" 6. Favouritism is precisely the taking of one man's right and handing it to another, and that is the very thing ruled out here 6. As for the will, it is not without a declared limit: "Lo! Allah forgiveth not that a partner should be ascribed unto Him. He forgiveth (all) save that to whom He will." 11 — one door closed by the text, and what falls below it is left to His will. And that is as far as this answer goes: the portion left to His will is not known by any regular rule, and anyone looking here for a table will not find one 11.