The shares, unit shares, bases and reason texts in these examples are produced by the engine itself when the page is built — not written by hand. So no example here can say something the calculator above contradicts. The commentary under each is ours, and every ruling in it is attributed to its school.
A wife, a son and a daughter
A man died leaving a wife, a son and a daughter.
Base of the problem 8
exact
|
Wife |
1/8 |
Fixed share: 1/8 |
|
Son |
7/12 |
Residuary — takes what remains after the fixed-share heirs |
|
Daughter |
7/24 |
Residuary — takes what remains after the fixed-share heirs |
What this teaches: The wife has a fixed share; the two children are residuaries taking what remains — the male taking twice the female's portion. The daughter takes no fixed half: her brother made her a residuary with him, so the two divide the remainder.
A husband, two daughters and a father — with increase (awl)
A woman died leaving a husband, two daughters and a father.
Base of the problem 12
increased (awl)
|
Husband |
3/13 |
Fixed share: 1/4 before awl |
|
Daughter × 2 |
4/13 |
Fixed share: 2/3 before awl |
|
Father |
2/13 |
Fixed share: 1/6 before awl |
• The problem increased by awl: the fixed shares exceeded the whole, so it was divided in proportion to the portions.
What this teaches: The fixed shares came together to more than the estate, so everyone's share was reduced in the same proportion — that is the increase of the shares (awl). It is the position of the majority of the jurists and what Egyptian law applies; Ibn Abbas differed.
A husband, a full sister and a mother
A woman died leaving a husband, a full sister and a mother.
Base of the problem 6
increased (awl)
|
Husband |
3/8 |
Fixed share: 1/2 before awl |
|
Mother |
1/4 |
Fixed share: 1/3 before awl |
|
Full sister |
3/8 |
Fixed share: 1/2 before awl |
• The problem increased by awl: the fixed shares exceeded the whole, so it was divided in proportion to the portions.
What this teaches: The mother took the full third, because there is no inheriting descendant and no two or more siblings. The case then went to awl — the increase of the shares — and all three shares were reduced.
A daughter, a son's daughter and a full sister
A man died leaving a daughter, a son's daughter and a full sister.
Base of the problem 6
exact
|
Daughter |
1/2 |
Fixed share: 1/2 |
|
Son’s daughter |
1/6 |
Fixed share: 1/6 |
|
Full sister |
1/3 |
Residuary — takes what remains after the fixed-share heirs |
• The sisters are residuaries with the daughters and take what remains.
What this teaches: The son's daughter took the sixth, completing the two thirds after the daughter's half. The full sister became a residuary with the daughters and took what remained — she has no fixed share here.
A husband and both parents — the two Umariyya cases
A woman died leaving a husband, a father and a mother.
Base of the problem 6
exact
|
Husband |
1/2 |
Fixed share: 1/2 |
|
Mother |
1/6 |
A third of what remains after the spouse’s share (the two ʿUmariyya cases) — that is 1/6 of the estate |
|
Father |
1/3 |
Residuary — takes what remains after the fixed-share heirs |
• The two ʿUmariyya cases: the mother takes a third of what remains after the spouse’s fixed share.
What this teaches: The mother takes a third of what remains after the husband's fixed share, not a third of the estate — otherwise the mother would be preferred over the father in a case in which the two are equal. This was the judgment of Umar (may Allah be pleased with him), and the majority hold it; Ibn Abbas differed.
A daughter alone — the return (radd)
A man died leaving one daughter and no other heir with her.
Base of the problem 2
deficient, with radd
|
Daughter |
1 |
Fixed share: 1/2 |
• The residue was returned to the fixed-share heirs in proportion to their shares; nothing is returned to a spouse.
What this teaches: Her fixed share is the half, and no residuary remained to take the rest — so it was returned to her. The return (radd) is the position of Abu Hanifa and Ahmad, and what Egyptian law applies; nothing is returned to either spouse.
A daughter's daughter alone — the distant kindred
A woman died leaving a daughter's daughter and no other heir with her.
Base of the problem 1
to the distant kindred
|
Daughter’s daughter |
1 |
Distant kindred — there is no fixed-share heir by blood and no residuary, so the remainder is theirs |
• There is no fixed-share heir by blood and no residuary, so the remainder goes to the distant kindred by the method of kinship.
What this teaches: She is neither a fixed-share heir nor a residuary, but she is one of the distant kindred. Were it not for inheritance by the distant kindred, the case would have been declared «لا وارث» — an estate with no heir — although an heir does exist who is entitled to the whole estate. So article 31 of law 77 of 1943 provides.
Al-Mushtaraka — the schools differ on it
A woman died leaving a husband, a mother, two maternal half-brothers and a full brother.
Egypt
Base of the problem 6
exact
|
Husband |
1/2 |
Fixed share: 1/2 |
|
Mother |
1/6 |
Fixed share: 1/6 |
|
Maternal half-brother × 2 |
1/6 |
Among the uterine siblings — their fixed share is 1/3, divided equally: the male does not take twice the female’s portion here |
|
Full brother |
— |
Nothing remained after the fixed-share heirs |
• Al-Mushtaraka: the fixed-share heirs took the whole estate, so nothing remained for the full brothers — this is the view of Ali, Ubayy and Abu Musa, and the position of Abu Hanifa and Ahmad. On the view of Umar, Uthman and Zayd they share equally with the mother's children in the third.
• Withheld — whether Egyptian law adopts the joining in al-Mushtaraka: what is transmitted from article 10 conflicts with what is inferred from its silence. The difference is 0 or 1/9 for the full brother.
Zayd b. Thābit
Base of the problem 18
exact
|
Husband |
1/2 |
Fixed share: 1/2 |
|
Mother |
1/6 |
Fixed share: 1/6 |
|
Maternal half-brother × 2 |
1/9 |
Al-Mushtaraka — sharing the third equally: 2/9 |
|
Full brother |
1/9 |
Al-Mushtaraka — sharing the third equally: 1/9 |
• Al-Mushtaraka: the full brothers were joined with the mother's children equally in the third (the view of Umar, Uthman and Zayd).
What this teaches: Here the two schools diverge over the full brother's share: he takes nothing on the view of Ali and the school of Abu Hanifa and Ahmad (which is the Egyptian setting on this page), and he is joined with the uterine siblings in the third on the view of Umar, Uthman and Zayd. So switch the school in the calculator and see the difference.